|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|畜牧与饲料科学|不同修复措施对退化草地恢复效果的研究

不同修复措施对退化草地恢复效果的研究OACSTPCD

Effects of Different Remediation Measures on the Restoration of Degraded Grassland

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]探讨不同修复措施对退化草地的恢复效果.[方法]以内蒙古通辽市扎鲁特旗境内的中、重度退化草地为研究对象,采用围封(TW)、围封+补播(TB)、围封+补播+施肥(TBS)3 项措施进行修复.以外围放牧样地作为对照(CK),于 2016-2019 年连续监测并比较不同修复措施下退化草地的植被高度、盖度、地上生物量.[结果]2016-2019 年,TW、TB、TBS处理的植被高度、盖度、地上生物量均显著(P<0.05)高于放牧(CK)处理;修复当年(2016 年),TB和TBS处理的植被高度、盖度、地上生物量均显著(P<0.05)高于TW处理,并且TBS处理的植被高度、盖度显著(P<0.05)高于TB处理;2017 年,TBS处理的植被高度和地上生物量显著(P<0.05)高于TW和TB处理,TB和TBS处理的植被盖度显著(P<0.05)高于TW处理;2018 年,TB和TBS处理的植被地上生物量显著(P<0.05)高于TW处理,TBS处理的植被地上生物量显著(P<0.05)高于TB处理;2019 年,TB和TBS处理的植被盖度和地上生物量显著(P<0.05)高于TW处理.[结论]围封、围封+补播、围封+补播+施肥 3 项措施对中、重度退化草地都表现出较好的修复效果,以围封+补播+施肥的修复效果最佳.

[Objective]This study was conducted to assess the effects of different remediation measures on the restoration of degraded grassland.[Method]A restoration trial with three measures,including enclosure(TW),enclosure+supplementary sowing(TB),and enclosure+supplementary sowing+fertilization(TBS),was performed on the moderately and severely degraded grasslands in Jarud Banner,Tongliao City,Inner Mongolia.Using the peripheral grazing plots as control(CK),the vegetation height,coverage and above-ground biomass of the degraded grasslands were continuously monitored and compared under different remediation measures from 2016 to 2019.[Result]During the whole monitoring period,the vegetation height,coverage and above-ground biomass of TW,TB and TBS treatments were all significantly(P<0.05)higher than those of CK.In the current year of restoration(2016),the vegetation height,coverage and above-ground biomass of TB and TBS treatments were significantly(P<0.05)higher than those of TW treatment,and the vegetation height and coverage of TBS treatment were significantly(P<0.05)higher than those of TB treatment.In 2017,the vegetation height and above-ground biomass of TBS treatment were significantly(P<0.05)higher than those of TW and TB treatments,and the vegetation coverage of TB and TBS treatments was significantly(P<0.05)higher than that of TW treatment.In 2018,the vegetation above-ground biomass of TB and TBS treatments was significantly(P<0.05)higher than that of TW treatment,and the vegetation above-ground biomass of TBS treatment was significantly(P<0.05)higher than that of TB treatment.In 2019,the vegetation coverage and above-ground biomass of TB and TBS treatments were significantly(P<0.05)higher than those of TW treatment.[Conclusion]The remediation measures of enclosure,enclosure +supplementary sowing,and enclosure +supplementary sowing +fertilization all had good restoration effects on moderately and severely degraded grasslands,with enclosure+supplementary sowing+fertilization having the best restoration effect.

张晓严;王雅茹;张健;陈翔;超乐萌;席亚琴;金净;冯彩霞;胡努斯吐;张天宇

蒙草生态环境(集团)股份有限公司,内蒙古 呼和浩特 010070内蒙古自治区林业和草原监测规划院,内蒙古呼和浩特 010020巴彦淖尔市林业和草原事业发展中心,内蒙古 巴彦淖尔 015002

畜牧业

退化草地修复措施恢复效果围封补播施肥

degraded grasslandremediation measurerestoration effectenclosuresupplementary sowingfertilization

《畜牧与饲料科学》 2024 (002)

45-49 / 5

国家重点研发计划项目(SQ2023YFF1300040).

10.12160/j.issn.1672-5190.2024.02.006

评论