|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|护理研究|简体中文版社会影响量表的修订及信效度检验

简体中文版社会影响量表的修订及信效度检验OA北大核心CSTPCD

Revision of the Simplified Chinese version of the Social Impact Scale and its reliability and validity test

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:对中文版社会影响量表(Social Impact Scale,SIS)进行修订,并检验其信效度.方法:遵循Beaton文化调适指南,应用专家咨询进行文化调适,形成简体中文版SIS.通过便利抽样法,选择417例癌症病人进行问卷调查,评价量表的信效度.结果:简体中文版SIS包括4个维度,共22个条目.量表的条目内容效度指数为0.875~1.000,平均内容效度指数为0.978;探索性因子分析提取4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为64.040%;验证性因子分析显示模型结构拟合良好.总量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.925,4个维度的Cronbach's α系数为0.748~0.810,分半信度为0.890,重测信度为0.901.结论:简体中文版SIS信效度良好,可以用于我国癌症病人病耻感的评估.

Objective:To revise the traditional Chinese version of the Social Impact Scale(SIS),and to test its reliability and validity.Methods:Following Beaton's cultural adjustment guide,and using Delphi expert letter consultation method for cultural adjustment,the simplified Chinese version of SIS was developed.A questionnaire survey was conducted on 417 cancer patients by convenience sampling to evaluate the reliability and validity of the simplified Chinese version of SIS.Results:The simplified Chinese version of SIS had 4 dimensions and 22 items.The item-level content validity index(I-CVI)ranged from 0.875 to 1.000,and the average scale-content validity index(S-CVI)was 0.978.Exploratory factor analysis extracted 4 common factors,and the cumulative contribution rate of variance was 64.040%.The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model structure fit well.The total Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.925,and the Cronbach's α coefficients of each dimension ranged from 0.748 to 0.810.The half coefficient was 0.890.The total test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.901.Conclusions:The simplified Chinese version of SIS demonstrated good reliability and validity,which could be used as an assessment tool for assessing the stigma of cancer patients in China.

李艳清;钱燕;严晓玲;朱颖倩;陈星;杨雪妮;蔡晶;杜林静;徐秀群

南通大学附属医院,江苏 226001南通大学医学院

癌症病耻感量表信度效度

cancerstigmascalereliabilityvalidity

《护理研究》 2024 (008)

1336-1342 / 7

10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2024.08.004

评论