|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|护理研究|患者搬运相关安全工作行为量表的汉化及信效度检验

患者搬运相关安全工作行为量表的汉化及信效度检验OA北大核心CSTPCD

Chinese version of Safe Work Behavior related to Patient Handling and its reliability and validity test

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:翻译患者搬运相关的安全工作行为量表(Safe Work Behavior related to Patient Handling,SWB-PH),并检验中文版SWB-PH的信度和效度.方法:依据跨文化调试指南,通过专家函询及预调查形成中文版SWB-PH.采用便利抽样法,选取深圳市3所三级甲等医院的134名家庭照顾者进行问卷调查,检验量表信度和效度.结果:中文版SWB-PH包括2个维度,共13个条目.条目水平的内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.80~1.00,量表水平内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.96;验证性因子分析结果显示主要拟合指标均符合标准.总量表的Cronbach's α系数为 0.799,各因子的Cronbach's α系数分别为 0.775,0.821;折半信度为 0.724,重测信度为0.958.结论:中文版SWB-PH信度和效度良好,可作为评价我国家庭照顾者患者搬运相关安全工作行为的有效工具.

Objective:To translate the Safe Work Behavior related to Patient Handling(SWB-PH),and to test its reliability and validity.Methods:According to the cross-cultural debugging guide,the Chinese version SWB-PH was formed through expert correspondence and pre-investigation.A questionnaire survey was conducted among 134 family caregivers from 3 tertiary grade A hospitals in Shenzhen with convenience sampling method to test the reliability and validity of the scale.Results:The Chinese version of SWB-PH include two dimensions and 13 items.The item-level content validity index(I-CVI)ranged from 0.80 to 1.00.The the scale-content validity index(S-CVI)was 0.96.The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the main fitting indexes met the criteria.The total Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.799,and the Cronbach's α coefficients of each dimension were 0.775 and 0.821.The half coefficient was 0.724.The total test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.958.Conclutions:The Chinese version of SWB-PH had good reliability and validity,which could be used as an effective tool to evaluate the safe work behavior of family caregivers related to patient handling in China.

孙玉娇;戴利;赖美雅;林琳;李金英;熊娇;梁肃

广西中医药大学,广西 530200深圳市宝安区人民医院

患者搬运安全行为家庭照顾者信度效度

patient handlingsafety behaviorfamily caregiversreliabilityvalidity

《护理研究》 2024 (008)

1358-1364 / 7

10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2024.08.007

评论