|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|中国医学装备|基于闭环双向对标管理模式的医疗设备临床配置路径优化研究

基于闭环双向对标管理模式的医疗设备临床配置路径优化研究OACSTPCD

Research on optimization of clinical allocation path of medical equipment based on closed-loop bidirectional benchmarking management mode

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:基于双闭环工作路径构建闭环双向对标管理模式,提高医疗设备临床配置水平.方法:构建招标采购和临床使用的闭环双向对标管理指标体系,采用奇异值分解算法选取标杆,形成双向对标管理模式.选取2018年6月至2022年5月解放军总医院采购的357台医疗设备,包括医用电子仪器、手术室设备、医学检验仪器、生命支持设备、医学影像设备及其他医疗设备,分别采用专家论证管理模式(165台)和闭环双向对标管理模式(192台)进行设备临床配置管理,对比两种配置管理模式的医疗设备临床配置管理效果.结果:采用闭环双向对标管理模式的医用电子仪器、手术室设备、医学检验仪器、生命支持设备、医学影像设备及其他医疗设备的临床配置管理评估值分别为(0.86±0.07)、(0.87±0.05)、(0.88±0.05)、(0.84±0.07)、(0.87±0.04)和(0.85±0.05),均高于专家论证管理模式,其差异有统计学意义(t=2.564、3.228、4.641、2.719、2.774、3.490,P<0.05);医疗设备采购失败率和管理成本增幅分别为(2.78±1.97)%和(0.98±0.70)%,低于专家论证管理模式,其差异有统计学意义(t=3.322、2.538,P<0.05);医疗设备验收通过率和开机运转率分别为(98.10±2.68)%和(91.54±4.76)%,均高于专家论证管理模式,其差异有统计学意义(t=3.470、2.125,P<0.05).医院设备采购及使用相关工作人员对采用闭环双向对标管理模式的医疗设备配置流程合理性、制度规范性和质量有效性满意度分别为98.75%、93.75%和100%,均高于专家论证管理模式,其差异有统计学意义(x2=5.769、4.006、6.234,P<0.05).结论:闭环双向对标管理模式能够使配置的医疗设备更好地满足临床科室需求,最大化地应用于疾病诊疗和科研教学,提高招标采购和运行管理的规范性.

Objective:To construct a bidirectional benchmarking management mode based on the dual closed-loop working path to improve the clinical allocation level of medical equipment.Methods:A dual closed-loop management index system for bidding procurement and clinical use was constructed,and the singular value decomposition algorithm was used to select benchmarks to form a bidirectional benchmarking management mode.A total of 357 sets of medical equipment purchased by the PLA General Hospital from June 2018 to May 2022 were selected,including medical electronic instruments,operating room equipment,medical testing instruments,life support equipment,medical imaging equipment and other medical equipment.The expert demonstration management mode(165 units)and bidirectional benchmarking management mode(192 units)were used to manage the clinical allocation of medical equipment,and the clinical allocation management effects of the two allocation management modes were compared.Results:The clinical allocation management evaluation values of medical electronic instruments,operating room equipment,medical laboratory equipment,life support equipment,medical imaging equipment,and other medical equipment using the bidirectional benchmarking management mode were(0.86±0.07),(0.87±0.05),(0.88±0.05),(0.84±0.07),(0.87±0.04)and(0.85±0.05),respectively,which were higher than the higher than those of the expert demonstration management mode,the differences was statistically significant(t=2.564,3.228,4.641,2.719,2.774,3.490,P<0.05);the failure rate of medical equipment procurement and the increase of management costs were(2.78±1.97)%and(0.98±0.70)%,respectively,which were lower than those of the expert demonstration management model,the difference was statistically significant(t=3.322,2.538,P<0.05),the acceptance pass rate and start-up operation rate of medical equipment were(98.10±2.68)%and(91.54±4.76)%,respectively,which were higher than those of the expert demonstration management mode,the difference was statistically significant(t=3.470,2.125,P<0.05).The satisfaction rates of staff related to the procurement and use of hospital equipment with the rationality of the medical equipment allocation process,the standardization of the system and the quality and effectiveness of bidirectional benchmarking management model were 98.75%,93.75%and 100%,respectively,which were higher than those of the expert demonstration management mode,the difference was statistically significant(x2=5.769,4.006,6.234,P<0.05).Conclusion:The closed-loop bidirectional benchmarking management mode can enable the medical equipment allocated better meet the needs of clinical departments,maximize the application in disease diagnosis and treatment,scientific research and teaching,and improve the standardization of bidding procurement and operation management.

张梦圆;邓迎敏;张妍妍;程丽;谷中慧;贾利民;伍洪

解放军总医院医疗保障中心医学工程科 北京 100853

预防医学

闭环路径对标管理临床配置招标采购运行效益

Closed-loop pathBenchmarking managementClinical allocationProcurement by biddingOperation benefit

《中国医学装备》 2024 (004)

145-150 / 6

10.3969/j.issn.1672-8270.2024.04.029

评论