|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|江西农业大学学报|健康与上草黄鳝菌群组成差异分析

健康与上草黄鳝菌群组成差异分析OA北大核心CSTPCD

Differences in composition of microbial between healthy swamp eels(Monopterus albus)and swamp eels lying on water grass

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]旨在揭示健康与上草黄鳝菌群组成差异,为判别黄鳝病害提供参考依据.[方法]收集健康黄鳝养殖水体(HW)、体表粘液(HN)、肠道粘膜(HC)和上草黄鳝养殖水体(BW)、体表粘液(BN)和肠道粘膜(BC)为试验材料,通过Illumina高通量测序分析菌群结构.[结果](1)上草黄鳝降低了菌群的Alpha多样性,其中,HN组Alpha多样性最高,极显著高于BN(P<0.01).PCoA分析发现健康和上草黄鳝的体表粘液和肠道粘膜菌群分别显著分离.(2)在门水平上,上草黄鳝变形菌门(Proteobacteria)、厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)丰度上升,拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)、梭杆菌门(Fusobacteria)丰度降低;属水平上,气单胞菌属(Aeromonas)、金黄杆菌属(Chryseobacterium)、黄杆菌属(Flavobacterium)、乳球菌属(Lactococcus)、水小杆菌属(Undibacterium)、无色杆菌属(Achromobacter)等丰度升高,鲸杆菌属、Pedobacter、Emticicia、多核杆菌属(Polynucleobacter)等丰度降低.(3)LefSe分析发现HN与HC组优势差异物种均为鲸杆菌属、邻单胞菌属(Plesiomonas);BN组优势差异物种主要为黄杆菌属、金黄杆菌属、气单胞菌属、水小杆菌属等.BC组优势差异物种主要为假单胞菌属(Pseudomonas)、无色杆菌属、噬酸菌属(Acidovorax)、乳球菌属等.其中,气单胞菌属的相对丰度在健康黄鳝和上草黄鳝中均表现出从水体-体表粘液-肠道黏膜逐渐降低的趋势,而鲸杆菌属则主要在健康黄鳝的体表粘液和肠道粘膜中富集.(4)功能预测结果显示,上草黄鳝的致病性、胁迫耐受表型菌群丰度均高于健康黄鳝,且主要涉及的是变形菌门中菌群.[结论]首次从微生态的角度分析水体-体表粘液-肠道粘膜菌群与黄鳝上草行为的相互关系.研究结果显示,健康与上草黄鳝的养殖水体、体表粘液及肠道粘膜菌群结构存在显著差异.健康黄鳝微生物多样性较高,有益菌(如鲸杆菌属等)丰度较高;而上草黄鳝微生物多样性较低,潜在致病性细菌(如变形菌门的气单胞菌属等)丰度显著上升,提示气单胞菌属和鲸杆菌属可考虑作为黄鳝发生上草行为的候选微生物标志物.

[Objective]The This study aims to uncover the differences in the microbiota composition of healthy and water grass-lying eels,thus providing reference for preventing diseases of swamp eel farming.[Method]Water(HW,BW),body surface mucus(HN,BN),and intestinal mucosa(HC,BC)from healthy and water grass-lying eels were collected as experimental materials.The microbial community structure was analyzed through Illumina high-throughput sequencing.[Result](1)Water grass-lying eels reduced the Alpha diversity of microbial communities.Among them,the Alpha diversity of the HN group was the highest,which was significantly higher than that of the BN group(P<0.01).PCoA analysis revealed significant separation of microbial communities in the body surface mucus and intestinal mucosa between healthy and water grass-lying eels.(2)At the phylum level,water grass-lying eels showed an increase in the abundance of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes,while the abundance of Bacteroidetes and Fusobacteria decreased.At the genus level,there was an increase in the abundance of genera such as Aeromonas,Chryseobacterium,Flavobacterium,Lactococcus,Undibacterium,and Achromobacter,and a decrease in the abundance of genera like Cetobacterium,Pedobacter,Emticicia,Polynucleobacter and so on.(3)LefSe analysis identified dominant differential species in the HN and HC groups as belonging to the genera Cetobacterium and Plesiomonas.The BN group's dominant differential species were mainly Flavobacterium,Chryseobacterium,Aeromonas,and Undibacterium.The BC group's dominant differential species included Pseudomonas,Achromobacter,Acidovorax,and Lactococcus.The relative abundance of Aeromonas showed a gradual decrease from water to body surface mucus to intestinal mucosa in both healthy and water grass-lying eels,while the genus Cetobacterium was mainly enriched in the body surface mucus and intestinal mucosa of healthy eels.(4)The functional prediction results indicated that the pathogenicity and stress tolerance phenotype flora of water grass-lying eels were higher than those of healthy eels,and the main involvement is the flora of phylum Proteobacteria.[Conclusion]This study represents the first analysis from a microbial ecology perspective on the interrelationships between the microbiota of aquaculture water,body surface mucus,intestinal mucosa,and the grass-lying behavior of eels.The research findings indicate significant differences in the microbial community structures of aquaculture water,body surface mucus,and intestinal mucosa between healthy and water grass-lying eels.Healthy eels exhibit higher microbial diversity with a higher abundance of beneficial bacteria,such as those belonging to the Cetobacterium,while water grass-lying eels show lower microbial diversity,accompanied by a significant increase in the abundance of potential pathogenic bacteria,such as Aeromonas from the Proteobacteria phylum.This suggests that Aeromonas and Cetobacterium could be considered as candidate microbial markers for swamp eel water grass-lying behavior.

王颖;黄广华;周秋白;张锦华;周磊涛;包屹红;周文宗

江西农业大学 动物科学技术学院/南昌市特色水生生物营养生理与健康养殖重点实验室/特种水产研究所,江西南昌 330045江西农业大学 经济管理学院,江西 南昌 330045上海市农业科学院 生态环境保护研究所,上海 201403

水产学

黄鳝养殖水体体表粘液肠道粘膜菌群分析

swamp eel(Monopterus albus)aquaculture waterbody surface mucusintestinal mucosaflora analysis

《江西农业大学学报》 2024 (002)

467-480 / 14

国家现代农业产业技术体系专项资金项目(CARS-46) Project supported by Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System(CARS-46)

10.3724/aauj.2024043

评论