|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|中国医疗设备|数字疗法可用性评估量表研究

数字疗法可用性评估量表研究OACSTPCD

Study on Digital Therapeutics Usability Assessment Scale

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 对用于数字疗法的可用性评估量表以及评价维度展开研究分析,以更好地对数字疗法进行可用性评价.方法 通过文献调研及量表筛选分类,选取14个可用性量表进行讨论,分别对各量表的关键特征和评价维度进行讨论,分析各量表的评价侧重点;选出在数字疗法可用性评价中应重点注意的评价维度,对各量表关键特征进行打分,并选出用于数字疗法可用性评价针对性最强的量表.结果 各量表在条目数量、类型、信度等关键特征上存在明显差异,评价维度的侧重点也不同,其中最重要的评价指标为"易于学习/易学性""满意度""有效性""效率""易于使用/易用性""系统有用性""信息质量""可控性".本文建立了可用性指标体系,体系分为2个纵向(用户、产品)和3个横向(需求、操作、结果)共6个部分(感知/认知、功能、行为、性能、态度、评价),涵盖了用户和产品在人机交互全周期的评价;选出了移动健康应用可用性问卷(mHealth APP Usability Questionnaire,MAUQ)、手机应用评定量表(Mobile APP Rating Scale,MARS)和用户移动应用评定量表(User Mobile App Rating Scale,uMARS)作为14个量表中最适用于数字疗法软件的可用性评估量表,并对其进行区分.结论 进行数字疗法可用性评估时,可按照本文建立的指标体系对产品的可用性进行全面评估.在选取可用性评估量表时,可按照研究需求在MAUQ、MARS和uMARS中进行选择.

Objective To analyze the usability assessment scale and evaluation dimensions used for digital therapeutics,so as to better evaluate the usability of digital therapeutics.Methods Through literature research and scale screening and classification,14 usability scales were selected for discussion,the key features and evaluation dimensions of each scale were discussed,respectively,the evaluation focus of each scale was analyzed.The evaluation dimensions that should be paid attention to in the evaluation of digital therapeutics usability were selected,the key features of each scale were scored,and the scale with the strongest pertinence was selected for the evaluation of the usability of digital therapeutics.Results There were obvious differences in the number of items,type,reliability and other key features of the scales,and the emphasis of the evaluation dimension was also different.The most important evaluation indicators were"easy to learn""satisfaction""effectiveness""efficiency""easy to use""system usefulness""information quality""controllability".The usability index system was built in this paper and was divided into two vertical(users,products)and three horizontal(demands,operations,results),with a total of six parts(perception/cognition,function,behavior,performance,attitude,evaluation),covering the evaluation of users and products in the whole cycle of human-computer interaction.mHealth APP usability questionnaire(MAUQ),mobile APP rating scale(MARS),and user mobile APP rating scale(uMARS)were selected as the most suitable usability assessment scales for digital therapeutics software among the 14 scales,and were distinguished.Conclusion When evaluating the availability of digital therapeutics,the product availability can be comprehensively evaluated according to the index system established in this paper.When selecting the usability evaluation scale,researchers can choose from MAUQ,MARS and uMARS according to their research needs.

冉琳;黄灏飞;李澍

重庆大学 生物医学工程系,重庆 400044||中国食品药品检定研究院 医疗器械检定所,北京 102629重庆大学 生物医学工程系,重庆 400044中国食品药品检定研究院 医疗器械检定所,北京 102629

预防医学

数字疗法可用性评估可用性量表评价维度评价指标体系

digital therapeuticsusability assessmentusability scaleevaluation dimensionsevaluation index system

《中国医疗设备》 2024 (004)

13-19 / 7

国家重点研发计划(2020YFC2007105).

10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2024.04.003

评论