|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|中国脑血管病杂志|经桡动脉入路与股动脉入路应用血流导向装置治疗颅内动脉瘤的效果对比分析

经桡动脉入路与股动脉入路应用血流导向装置治疗颅内动脉瘤的效果对比分析OA北大核心CSTPCD

Comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy between trans-radial and trans-femoral artery approach on the implantation of the Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 对比分析经桡动脉入路(TRA)与经股动脉入路(TFA)行Pipeline血流导向装置(PED)置入治疗颅内动脉瘤的安全性及有效性.方法 回顾性连续纳入2022年1-12月入住郑州大学第一附属医院神经介入科的颅内动脉瘤患者139例,均使用PED治疗.依据通路不同,将颅内动脉瘤患者分为TRA组(20例)和TFA组(119例).记录并对比分析两组患者的人口学信息(年龄、性别)、相关危险因素(高血压病、糖尿病、吸烟史、卒中史)、动脉瘤相关数据[动脉瘤形态(囊状、非囊状)、数量(单发、多发)、部位(前循环、后循环、分叉部)、瘤颈、载瘤动脉直径、瘤囊、是否为复发动脉瘤、是否合并分支]、有效性终点(通路建立后PED置入成功,且完全覆盖瘤颈口)、安全性终点(术中及术后穿刺部位、神经系统并发症).穿刺部位并发症包括穿刺部位血肿、桡动脉痉挛、桡动脉闭塞等,神经系统并发症包括急性期支架内血栓形成、术中及术后卒中等.结果 两组患者人口学信息、相关危险因素、动脉瘤相关数据的组间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).两组手术通路均成功建立且PED置入成功,未发生术中通路转换.TRA组20例患者中,发生术后穿刺部位血肿1例,穿刺部位并发症发生率为5.0%;术后神经系统并发症1例,其发生率为5.0%;无术中安全性终点事件.TFA组119例患者中,发生术后穿刺部位血肿4例、动静脉瘘1例、假性动脉瘤5例,穿刺部位并发症发生率为8.4%;术后神经系统并发症8例,其发生率为6.7%;无术中安全性终点事件.两组患者术后安全性终点事件发生率的差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论 初步分析表明,TRA与TFA行PED置入治疗颅内动脉瘤的有效性及安全性相当.

Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of transradial approach(TRA)with transfemoral approach(TFA)on the implantation of the Pipeline embolization device(PED)for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.Methods The study retrospectively collected data on patients who were admitted to the department of Neurointervention,the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2022 and December 2022,and were treated with the PED.The patients were divided into two groups based on their access approach:TRA group(20cases)and TFA group(119cases).Data were recorded and compared,including demographic information(age,gender),related risk factors(hypertension,diabetes,smoking history,stroke history),aneurysmal data(aneurysm shape[cystic,non-cystic],number[single,multiple],location[anterior circulation,posterior circulation and bifurcation],neck of tumor,diameter of parental artery,cyst,whether recurrent aneurysm,whether merging branche),efficacy endpoint(successful PED placement after access establishment and complete coverage of the aneurysm neck),and safety endpoint(intraoperative and postoperative puncture site complications,neurological complications).Puncture site complications included puncture site hematoma,radial artery spasm,radial artery occlusion,etc.Neurological complications included acute stent thrombosis,intraoperative and postoperative stroke,etc.Results There were no significant differences in demographic information,related risk factors and aneurysm-related data between two groups(all P>0.05).Surgical pathways were successfully established,and PED were successfully implanted in both groups,and no intraoperative pathway conversion occurred.Among the 20patients in TRA group,1 case had postoperative puncture site hematoma,and the incidence rate was 5.0%;postoperative neurological complications occurred in 1 case(5.0%).There were no intraoperative safety endpoints.Among the 119 patients in TFA group,there were 4 cases of postoperative puncture site hematoma,1 case of arteriovenous fistula,and 5 cases of pseudoaneurysm,with the incidence of puncture site complication was 8.4%.There were 8 cases of postoperative neurological complications(6.7%).There were no intraoperative safety endpoints.There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative safety endpoint events between two groups(all P>0.05).Conclusion This preliminary study showed that PED treatment with TRA has comparable efficacy and safety as TFA.

张航;袁永杰;付宇;马亚静;李元智;刘继发;管生

450052 郑州大学第一附属医院神经介入科

桡动脉股动脉血管内操作颅内动脉瘤血流导向装置

Radial arteryFemoral arteryEndovascular proceduresIntracranial aneurysmEmbolization device

《中国脑血管病杂志》 2024 (004)

246-252 / 7

10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2024.04.004

评论