|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|中国康复理论与实践|康复患者次均住院费用影响因素的分析:基于分位数回归模型

康复患者次均住院费用影响因素的分析:基于分位数回归模型OA北大核心CSTPCD

Influencial factors of average hospitalization costs of rehabilitation inpatients based on quantile regression model

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 分析甘肃省二级、三级医院康复住院患者次均住院费用的分布特点及其影响因素. 方法 分层抽取2017年1月1日至2023年6月30日甘肃省59家二级、三级医院康复住院患者病历6 950份,收录电子病历管理系统住院病案首页信息数据.描述康复患者次均住院费用的分布及特点,并运用分位数回归模型分析次均住院费用的影响因素. 结果 纳入患者次均住院费用为6 282.65(4 095.39,11 829.36)元.多因素分析结果显示,康复患者的年龄(β>21.509)、住院时间(β>166.320)、医院级别(β>1096.971)、医院类别(|β|>969.080)、入院途径(β>307.731)、是否转科(β>732.289)和是否用药(β>737.109)对次均住院费用3个分位数点(P10,P50,P90)均有影响(P<0.05),均呈现对高分位点影响最强.2017年至2019年入院的康复患者较2020年至2023年的康复患者在第10分位点次均住院费用较低(β=-732.341),在第90分位点费用较高(β = 846.445)(P<0.05).以自费为对照,医保支付的次均住院费用在第10分位点更高(β职工医保 = 450.606,β居民医保 = 478.421),在第90分位点上费用更低(β职工医保 =-2517.823,β居民医保 =-1283.355)(P<0.05),在第90分位点影响更大.以其他类型疾病为对照,精神与行为障碍、神经系统疾病费用更低(β<-569.500),循环系统疾病在第10分位点上费用更高(β = 457.393),肌肉骨骼和结缔组织疾病在第50(β =-1106.791)、第90分位点上费用(β =-3072.947)更低(P<0.05). 结论 康复患者次均住院费用差异大,影响因素复杂,医保相比自费在次均住院费用的高分位点有保护作用.

Objective To analyze the distribution and the influcing factors of the average hospitalization costs of rehabilitation inpa-tients of secondary and tertiary hospitals in Gansu Province. Methods The medical records of 6 950 rehabilitation inpatients from January 1st,2017 to June 30th,2023 from 59 sec-ondary and tertiary hospitals in Gansu Province were selected by stratified sampling.The home pages of inpatient medical records were collected through the electronic medical record management system.The distribution and characteristics of the average hospitalization costs of rehabilitation patients were described,and the influencing factors of the average hospitalization costs were analyzed by quantile regression model. Results The average hospitalization cost was 6 282.65(4 095.39,11 829.36)yuan per admission.Multivariate analysis showed that the age(β>21.509),length of stay(β>166.320),hospital level(β>1096.971),hospital category(|β|>969.080),admission pathway(β>307.731),inter-department transference(β>732.289)and medication use(β>737.109)effected the three quantile points(P10,P50,P90)of the average hospitalization costs(P<0.05),the strongest on the highest quantile point.The average hospitalization costs of rehabilitation inpatients admitted from 2017 to 2019 were lower than that admitted from 2020 to 2023 at the 10th quartile point(β=-732.341),but higher at the 90th quartile point(β = 846.445)(P<0.05).Compared with self-payment,the average hospitaliza-tion costs of rehabilitation inpatients paid by medical insurance were higher at the 10th quartile point(βstaff = 450.606,βresident = 478.421),lower at the 90th quartile point(βstaff =-2517.823,βresident =-1283.355)(P<0.05).Compared with other types of diseases,mental and behavioral disorders and neurological diseases cost less(β<-569.500),while circulatory diseases cost more at the 10th quartile point(β = 457.393);and musculoskeletal and connective tissue diseases cost less at the 50th(β =-1106.791)and 90th(β =-3072.947)quartile point(P<0.05). Conclusion The average hospitalization cost varies greatly among different rehabilitation patients,and the influencing factors are complex.Compared with self-payment,medical insurance plays a protective role on the high quantile point of the average hospitalization costs.

蒋娜;裴泓波;王建云;卫宁;曾艳玲;张倩;益筱哲;陈万强;景玉珍;寄婧;郭旭升

兰州大学公共卫生学院,甘肃兰州市 730000甘肃省康复中心医院,甘肃兰州市 730000兰州大学第一医院,甘肃兰州市 730000

临床医学

住院费用康复影响因素分位数回归

hospitalization costrehabilitationinfluencing factorsquantile regression

《中国康复理论与实践》 2024 (004)

397-403 / 7

甘肃省卫生健康行业科研项目(No.GSWSKY2022-04) Supported by Health and Health Industry Research Project in Gansu Province(No.GSWSKY2022-04)

10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2024.04.004

评论