|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|中国药物经济学|乌帕替尼缓释片治疗中国自身免疫介导炎症性疾病——特应性皮炎与类风湿关节炎及银屑病关节炎的药物经济学评价

乌帕替尼缓释片治疗中国自身免疫介导炎症性疾病——特应性皮炎与类风湿关节炎及银屑病关节炎的药物经济学评价OA

Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Upadacitinib in the Treatment of Autoimmune-related Diseases(Atopic Dermatitis,Rheumatoid Arthritis,Psoriatic Arthritis)in China

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 对乌帕替尼缓释片治疗中国自身免疫介导炎症性疾病—难治性、中重度特应性皮炎(AD)、中重度活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)、活动性银屑病关节炎(PsA)进行药物经济学评价.方法 从卫生体系角度出发,采用决策树-马尔科夫模型,对比乌帕替尼缓释片相较于各适应证临床常用药物的经济性.结果 乌帕替尼缓释片均为绝对优势方案.在基础情景中,乌帕替尼缓释片在 AD(相较度普利尤单抗注射液)、RA 和 PsA(相较于阿达木单抗注射液)适应证中,为患者带来的QALYs分别增加了0.279、0.115、0.188,同时总成本降低 133 524 元(药品节约占比超99%)、5 090 元(药品节约占比近60%)、10 593 元(药品节约占比近90%).结论 乌帕替尼缓释片治疗效果好、年治疗费用更低、口服给药便利,经过长期模拟,其相对于目前临床常用方案,可带来更多的生命质量获益,同时可节约包括药品成本在内的直接医疗成本,为更具优势的方案.

Objective The pharmacoeconomic evaluation of Upadacitinib extended-release tablets was conducted for treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory disease in China,which include moderate to severe atopic dermatitis(AD),moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis(RA)),active psoriatic arthritis(PsA).Methods Three decision tree-Markov models were developed separately to evaluate the long-term costs and effectiveness of Upadacitinib compare with other common use drugs from the healthcare system perspective.Results Upadacitinib is more cost-effective compared with dupilumab injection in the treatment of AD and compared with adalimumab injection in the treatment of RA and PsA.Base case results showed the introduction of upadacitinib for the treatment of AD,RA,and PsA,yielded incremental Quality-Adjusted Life Years(QALYs)of 0.279,0.115,and 0.188,respectively.This incrementality in QALYs was concomitant with discernible cost reductions of ¥133 524(drug savings account for more than 99%of the total),¥5 090(drug savings account for 60%of the total),and ¥10 593(drug savings account for 90%of the total).Conclusion Upadacitinib evinced commendable therapeutic efficacy,low annul drug cost,expediency in oral administration.Through protracted simulation,it emerged as an agent heralding augmented improvements in the quality of life,as contrasted with extant clinical modalities.Simultaneously,it occasioned appreciable savings in the ambit of direct medical expenditures,encompassing pharmaceutical outlays.

杨涵;王雅洁;魏田;王俊锋;赵馨然;刘君

艾昆纬企业管理咨询(上海)有限公司,上海 200124

临床医学

乌帕替尼缓释片特应性皮炎类风湿关节炎银屑病关节炎药物经济学评价

UpadacitinibAtopic dermatitisRheumatoid arthritisPsoriatic arthritisPharmacoeconomic evaluation

《中国药物经济学》 2024 (003)

11-18,24 / 9

10.12010/j.issn.1673-5846.2024.03.002

评论