|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|中医药学报|不同提取方法对路路通活性成分及抗氧化性的比较研究

不同提取方法对路路通活性成分及抗氧化性的比较研究OACSTPCD

Comparative Study on the Active Ingredients and Antioxidant Properties of Sweetgum Fruit by Different Extraction Methods

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:研究回流提取法、酶解提取法、超声提取法对路路通活性成分没食子酸含量的影响,并比较其抗氧化活性.方法:正交法优化路路通回流提取法、酶解提取法的提取条件,超声提取方法参照文献,在最佳的提取条件下比较3 种方法对路路通中没食子酸提取率的影响;考察提取液对ABTS、DPPH、羟基自由基清除能力、Fe3+还原能力,比较不同提取方法对路路通抗氧化活性的影响.结果:回流提取法的最佳条件为乙醇体积分数为50%、回流时间为1h、液料比为1∶40(g/mL).酶解提取法提取的最佳提取工艺条件酶量为0.6 g、酶解时间为50 min、液料比为1∶30(g/mL).回流提取法、酶解提取法、超声提取法得到路路通中没食子酸的提取率分别为24.63%、20.08%、13.58%.三种方法提取的路路通提取液均具有良好的抗氧化能力,ABTS、羟基自由基清除能力、Fe3+还原能力与浓度呈正相关,DPPH法显示与浓度无明显的相关性,但不同提取方法对 DPPH 有良好的清除能力.当没食子酸浓度为5.4 mg/mL时,回流提取法、酶解提取法、超声提取法提取液对ABTS能力的清除率分别达到 97.01%、81.00%、95.60%;当没食子酸浓度为9.0 mg/mL时,对羟基自由基清除率分别达到88.11%、51.00%、78.73%,对Fe3+还原能力分别达到3.770、3.021、3.637;当路路通中没食子酸浓度3.6 mg/mL时,回流提取法、酶解提取法、超声提取法提取液对DPPH自由基清除率分别达到 90.15%、89.36%、90.06%.结论:回流提取方法能较好地提取路路通的活性成分没食子酸,没食子酸含量越高,路路通提取液的抗氧化能力越强.

Objective:To study the effects of reflux extraction,enzymolysis extraction and ultrasonic extraction on gallic acid content of sweetgum fruit,and compare its antioxidant activities.Methods:Orthogonal method was used to optimize the extraction conditions of the reflux extraction method and enzymolysis extraction method of sweetgum fruit;the ultrasonic extraction method was used according to the reference,and the effects of the three methods on the extraction rate of gallic acid in sweetgum fruit under the best extraction conditions were compared.The extraction solution's ability to scavenge ABTS,DPPH,hydroxyl radicals,and reduce Fe3+ was investigated,and the effects of different extraction methods on the antioxidant activity of sweetgum fruit were compared.Results:The optimal conditions for the reflux extraction method were 50%ethanol by volume,1h reflux time,and 1∶40(g/mL)liquid-to-material ratio.The optimal extraction process conditions for the enzymolysis extraction method were 0.6 g of enzyme,50 min of enzymolysis time,and 1∶30(g/mL)of liquid to material ratio.The extraction rates of gallic acid in sweetgum fruit were 24.63%,20.08%,and 13.58%,respectively,using reflux extraction,enzymatic extraction,and ultrasonic extraction methods.Sweetgum fruit extracts by all three extraction methods had good antioxidant capacity.The scavenging ability of ABTS,hydroxyl radicals and Fe3+ reduction ability were positively correlated with the concentration.The DPPH method is not related to concentration.However,there is a clear DPPH eliminating ability of extracts from different extraction methods.When the concentration of gallic acid was 5.4 mg/mL,the scavenging rates of ABTS capacity of the extracts by reflux extraction,enzymolysis extraction and ultrasonic extraction reached 97.01%,81.00%and 95.60%,respectively;when the concentration of gallic acid was 9.0 mg/mL,the scavenging rates of hydroxyl radicals reached 88.11%,51.00%and 78.73%,respectively,and the scavenging rate of Fe3+ reduction capacity reached 3.770,3.021,3.637,respectively.When the gallic acid concentration in sweetgum fruit was 3.6 mg/mL,the extracts by reflux extraction,enzymolysis extraction and ultrasonic extraction achieved 90.15%,89.36%and 90.06%scavenging of DPPH free radicals,respectively.Conclusion:The reflux extraction method can effectively extract the active ingredient gallic acid from sweetgum fruit.The higher the content of gallic acid,the stronger the antioxidant capacity of Sweetgum Fruit extract.

安琼;姬祥宁;魏媛;王贞香;李倩

河西学院医学院 甘肃省河西走廊特色资源利用重点实验室,甘肃 张掖 734000

中医学

路路通不同提取方法抗氧化性

Sweetgum fruitDifferent extraction methodsOxidation resistance

《中医药学报》 2024 (005)

38-45 / 8

甘肃省高等学校创新基金项目(2021A-120);甘肃省教育科技创新项目(2022B-172,2022B-205);甘肃省大学生省级创新训练项目(S202110740011,S202010740001)

10.19664/j.cnki.1002-2392.240092

评论