|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|建筑结构学报|带竖向肋条高层建筑风荷载的测力测压对比

带竖向肋条高层建筑风荷载的测力测压对比OA北大核心CSTPCD

Comparison of wind loads on high-rise buildings with vertical ribs obtained by force balance and pressure measuring tests

中文摘要英文摘要

为研究带竖向肋条高层建筑的风荷载,分别采用测压和测力风洞试验方法,分析肋条外伸长度与建筑顺风向宽度比(b/B)对高层建筑各立面风压分布的影响,对比测压和测力试验获得的结构基底剪力平均值和标准差.研究表明:正迎风情况下竖向肋条使得迎风面边缘风压急剧降低、甚至出现负风压,而背风面负风压绝对值随着b/B的增大而减小;在各风向角下,当b/B为1%~3%时结构基底剪力平均值的测力结果均大于测压结果,其主要原因是测压试验无法考虑肋条的挡风贡献,尤其在斜风向下两种试验方法结果的差异更大,最大相差14.89%;对于结构基底剪力的标准差,无肋条模型的测力结果大于测压结果,当b/B为1%~4%时,测力结果小于测压结果,当竖向肋条较长(b/B≥2%)时,测力试验比测压试验更适宜获取高层建筑的风荷载.根据测力试验结果,拟合了考虑竖向肋条影响的结构基底剪力平均值修正系数关系式,拟合公式可用于带有不同布置竖向肋条的高层建筑的基底剪力平均值评估.

In order to investigte the influence of vertical ribs on the wind loads of high-rise buildings,multiple point synchronous pressure(MPSP)and high-frequency force balance(HFFB)testing in a wind tunnel was carried out.On each face of the high-rise structures,the wind pressure distribution was examined in relation to the effect of the rib extension length to building width ratio(b/B).Then the mean and standard deviation of base shears obtained using MPSP and HFFB tests were compared.The testing results show that the outermost wind pressures on the windward side of the building are significantly reduced and even change to negative pressure in the windward direction.Furthermore,the absolute value of negative wind pressure on the leeward side of the building decreases with increase of the b/B.When b/B is in the range of 1%-3%,the mean base shears obtained from the HFFB tests are larger than those obtained from the MPSP tests for all wind angles.This is mainly due to the fact that the MPSP tests cannot consider the wind-resistant contribution of the rib,and the discrepancy between the two results will be especially large under oblique wind angles with the maximum discrepancy reaching 14.89%.Regarding the standard deviation of the base shear,the results of HFFB tests are larger than those of MPSP tests for the model without ribs,whereas the HFFB results are less than the MPSP results when the b/B is in the range of 1%-4%.When the rib length is noticeably big(e.g.,b/B ≥2%),it is strongly advised to utilize the HFFB test rather than the MPSP test to determine the wind load on high-rise buildings.The calculation methods for the mean base shear modification factor caused by the presence of the vertical ribs were established based on the results of the HFFB.The fitting formula can be used to evaluate the average base shear force of high-rise buildings with different arrangements of vertical ribs.

姜咏涵;沈国辉;余世策;姚剑锋

浙江大学结构工程研究所,浙江杭州 310058浙江水利水电学院建筑工程学院,浙江杭州 310018

土木建筑

高层建筑竖向肋条风洞试验测压试验测力试验基底剪力

high-rise buildingvertical ribwind tunnel testpressure measurement testforce balance testbase shear

《建筑结构学报》 2024 (005)

115-124 / 10

国家自然科学基金项目(52178511),浙江省公益技术研究计划(LGG21E080009),浙江省教育厅科研项目(Y202250876).

10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2023.0308

评论