|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|中国畜牧兽医|基于16S rDNA高通量测序技术分析限制基础饲粮补饲水培大麦苗对籽鹅肠道菌群的影响

基于16S rDNA高通量测序技术分析限制基础饲粮补饲水培大麦苗对籽鹅肠道菌群的影响OA北大核心CSTPCD

Effects of Restricted Basal Diet Supplemented with Hydroponic Barley Seedling on Intestinal Microflora of Zi Geese Using 16S rDNA High-throughput Sequencing Technology

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]本试验旨在通过16SrDNA高通量测序技术分析限制基础饲粮补饲水培大麦苗对籽鹅肠道菌群的影响.[方法]试验选取28日龄籽鹅160只,随机分为4组,每组4个重复,每个重复10只鹅.A组籽鹅自由采食基础饲粮,B、C和D组籽鹅分别以A组采食量的85%、72.5%和60%饲喂基础饲粮,自由采食水培大麦苗.试验期42 d.70日龄时,每个重复抽取2只籽鹅屠宰后取空肠和回肠混合内容物及盲肠内容物,通过Illumina MiSeq测序平台进行高通量测序及生物信息学分析.[结果]①籽鹅肠道微生物Alpha多样性指数和Beta多样性分析结果在各组间均无显著性差异(P>0.05).②4组籽鹅肠道微生物共有4个优势菌门(相对丰度>1%):厚壁菌门、变形菌门、拟杆菌门和放线菌门;共有7个优势菌属:肠球菌属、假单胞菌属、拟杆菌属、罕见小球菌属、颤螺菌属、栖粪杆菌属和螺杆菌属.D组放线菌门的相对丰度显著低于A组(P<0.05);B、C和D组螺旋体门、梭杆菌门、棒杆菌属、葡萄球菌属和气球菌属的相对丰度均显著低于A组,肠球菌属的相对丰度显著高于A组(P<0.05).③经LEfSe分析发现,A组籽鹅肠道微生物有标志物种4个:放线菌门、栖水菌属、乳杆菌属和乳杆菌科;B组有标志物种3个:叶绿体纲、链形植物目和间孢囊菌科;C组有标志物种11个:黄色单胞菌科、黄色单胞菌目、慢生根瘤菌科、草酸杆菌科、伯克氏菌目、劳尔氏菌属、β-变形菌纲、TM7菌门、TM7_3菌纲、Rs_045菌科和I025菌目;D组籽鹅肠道未发现标志物种.[结论]在本试验条件下,限制基础饲粮采食补饲水培大麦苗对籽鹅肠道微生物菌群多样性影响较小,但会影响菌群相对丰度,并能抑制部分致病菌生长、改善肠道健康状态;但基础饲粮供给比例过低可能引起菌群失衡.

[Objective]This experiment was conducted to explore the effects of restricted basal diet supplemented with hydroponic barley seedling on intestinal microflora of Zi geese using 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing technology.[Method]A total of 160 Zi geese at 28 days of age were randomly divided into 4 groups with 4 replicates in each group and 10 geese per replicate.Geese in group A were fed basal diet ad libitum.Geese in groups B,C and D were fed the basal diet with 85%,72.5%and 60%of the feed intake in group A,respectively,with free access to hydroponic barley seedlings.The experiment lasted for 42 days.Two goose was randomly selected and slaughtered from each replicate at 70 days of age,and the mixed contents of jejunum and ileum and cecum contents were collected as samples for high-throughput sequencing by Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform and bioinformatics analysis.[Result](D In terms of diversity analysis,there were no significant differences in Alpha diversity indexes and results of Beta diversity analysis among all groups(P>0.05).② Intestinal microflora from 4 groups had 4 common dominant phyla(relative abundanice>1%):Firmicutes,Proteobacteria,Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria,7 common dominant genera:Enterococcus,Pseudomonas,Bacteroides,Subdoligranulum,Oscillospira,Faecalibacterium and Helicobacter.Intestinal microflora in group D had significant lower Actinobacteria relative abundance than that of group A(P<0.05).Intestinal microflora in groups B,C and D had significant lower Spirochaetes,Fusobacteria,Corynebacterium,Staphylococcus and Aerococcus,and significant higher Enterococcus relative abundance than those of group A(P<0.05).③ LEfSe analysis found that intestinal microflora in group A had 4 labeled species:Actinobacteria,Enhydrobacter,Lactobacillus,Lactobacillaceae.The microflora in group B had 3 labeled species:Chloroplast,Streptophyta and Intrasporangiaceae.The microflora in group C had 11 labeled species:Xanthomonadaceae,Xanthomonadales,Bradyrhizobiaceae,Oxalobacteraceae,Burkholderiales,Ralstonia,beta-Proteobacteria,TM7,TM7_3,Rs_045 and I025.No labeled specie was found in the intestinal microflora in group D.[Conclusion]Under these experimental conditions,restricted basal diet supplemented with hydroponic barley seedling had no significant effect on diversity of intestinal microflora of Zi geese,while could affect relative abundance of microflora,and could inhibit the growth of some pathogenic bacteria and improve intestinal health.However,excessive low proportion of basal diet supply might cause intestinal flora imbalance.

董佳强;杨昊天;杨坤;魏念冬;周景明;韩永胜;江波涛;陈志峰;马志刚;霍明东;王志强;黄宇翔;邹跃;郭文凯;吕明哲;张红

黑龙江省农业科学院畜牧兽医分院,齐齐哈尔 161005

畜牧业

籽鹅水培大麦苗肠道菌群16S rDNA

Zi goosehydroponic barley seedlingintestinal microflora16S rDNA

《中国畜牧兽医》 2024 (005)

1921-1930 / 10

财政部和农业农村部—国家现代农业产业技术体系资助(CARS-42-34);齐齐哈尔市科技计划创新激励项目(CNYGG-2022016)

10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2024.05.013

评论