|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|中国真菌学杂志|直接PCR与多重实时PCR检测临床标本的实用性评估

直接PCR与多重实时PCR检测临床标本的实用性评估OACSTPCD

Evaluation of the practicability of direct PCR versus multiple real-time PCR for testing clinical specimens

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 评估与传统方法相比,直接PCR与DG(Derma Genius)多重实时PCR在鉴定皮肤癣菌菌种的临床实用性.方法 收集2020年3月—2021年3月中国医学科学院皮肤病医院184例由临床医师怀疑浅部真菌感染的皮屑或甲屑标本,分别行显微镜检、培养、直接PCR和DG多重实时PCR.以镜检和培养为金标准,比较两种PCR方法鉴定皮肤癣菌的有效性.结果 直接PCR和DG-PCR的灵敏度分别为64%、99.2%,特异度分别为99.6%、88.1%,阳性预测值分别为97.5%、94.7%,阴性预测值分别为55.9%、98.1%.125例阳性标本中,培养出71例(56.8%),直接PCR检测出81例(64.8%),DG-PCR检测出99例(79.2%).结论 DG-PCR、直接PCR在检测皮肤癣菌感染方面有较高的实用价值.

Objective To evaluate the clinical applicability of direct PCR and DG multiplex real-time PCR in the identifica-tion of dermatophytes strains compared with traditional methods.Methods A total of 184 samples of skin or nail scraps suspected of dermatophytosis were collected and divided into 4 samples.They were examined by direct microscopy,cul-tured,direct PCR and DG multiple real-time PCR,respectively.Using microscopic examination and culture as the gold standard,the efficacy of two skin PCR methods for identifying dermatomycosis was compared.Results The sensitivity of direct PCR and DG-PCR were 64%and 99.2%,respectively.The specificity was 99.6%and 88.1%,respectively.The positive predictive values were 97.5%and 94.7%,respectively.The negative predictive values were 55.9%and 98.1%,re-spectively.Among the 125 positive samples,71 cases(56.8%)were detected by culture,81 cases(64.8%)by direct PCR,and 99 cases(79.2%)by DG-PCR.Conclusion DG-PCR and direct PCR have high practical value in detecting dermatophy-ton infection.

臧晓慧;梁官钊;刘维达

北京协和医学院/中国医学科学院/皮肤病医院/皮肤病研究所,南京 210042

临床医学

皮肤癣菌病PCRDG-PCR

dermatomycosisPCRDG-PCR

《中国真菌学杂志》 2024 (001)

43-46 / 4

评论