|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|安全与环境工程|社会网络环境下考虑专家共识水平的群体FMEA方法研究

社会网络环境下考虑专家共识水平的群体FMEA方法研究OA北大核心CSTPCD

Research on group FMEA method considering expert consensus level in social network environment

中文摘要英文摘要

针对失效模式与影响分析(FMEA)方法评价中专家信息不完备以及专家与群体之间评估结果差异较大的问题,提出社会网络环境下考虑专家共识水平的群体FMEA方法.首先,在社会网络环境下采用二元信任/不信任矩阵来描述部分专家之间的信任/不信任问题,由于专家间可能存在互相不了解的情况,所以专家间除信任/不信任关系外还存在专家间的未知关系,因此在二元矩阵的基础上通过传播算子补全专家间信任/不信任和未知关系,从而建立三元信任/不信任矩阵,并通过专家间的互相信任情况得到各个专家的权重;然后,结合相似性聚合法(similarity aggregation method,SAM)计算专家评估结果与群体专家决策结果的相对一致度,融合专家权重与相对一致度指标得到各个专家的综合权重;最后,以灾害背景下城市应急管理能力的4个阶段指标为例,通过计算这4个阶段14个指标的风险优先级指数(risk priority number,RPN)得到影响城市应急管理能力的关键因素,验证了所提方法的可行性与有效性.

In response to the problems of incomplete expert information and significant differences in evalua-tion results between experts and groups in the failure mode and effects analysis(FMEA)method evalua-tion,this paper proposes a group FMEA method considering expert consensus level in the social network environment.Firstly,in the social network environment,a binary trust/distrust matrix was used to describe the trust/distrust issues among some experts.Due to the possibility of mutual lack of understanding among experts,there may be unknown relationships among experts in addition to trust/distrust relationships.Therefore,based on the binary matrix,a propagation operator was used to complete the trust/distrust and unknown relationships among experts,and a ternary trust/distrust matrix was established.The weights of each individual expert were obtained through the mutual trust between experts;then,through combining the similarity aggregation method(SAM),the relative consistency between expert evaluation results and group expert decision-making results was calculated,and through integrating expert weights and relative consistency indicators,the comprehensive weights of each expert were obtained.Finally,taking the four stage indicators of urban emergency management capacity in the context of disasters as an example,the key factors affecting urban emergency management capacities were identified by calculating the risk priority number(RPN)of the 14 indicators in these four stages,verifying the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

陈兆芳;徐政;黄文翰

福建理工大学管理学院,福建福州 350118福建省特种设备检验研究院,福建福州 350008

安全科学

社会网络环境失效模式与影响分析(FMEA)相似性聚合法(SAM)共识水平

social network environmentfailure mode and effects analysis(FMEA)similarity aggregation method(SAM)consensus level

《安全与环境工程》 2024 (003)

54-64 / 11

福建省社会科学规划重点项目(FJ2024MGCA027);福州市社会科学规划重点项目(2023FZB05)

10.13578/j.cnki.issn.1671-1556.20231292

评论