地质论评2024，Vol.70Issue(3)：1083-1096,14.DOI:10.16509/j.georeview.2024.04.001
城市地下空间资源地质环境适宜性评价方法对比分析
Comparative analysis of geological environment suitability evaluation methods for urban underground space resources
摘要
Abstract
In order to select the optimal geological suitability evaluation model of underground space resources,realize scientific and reasonable evaluation of underground space resources,and provide reasonable planning support for underground space development.In this paper,three different models are selected for comparative analysis,and their advantages,disadvantages and applicable conditions are summarized,and the geological suitability evaluation of underground space resources is evaluated by taking Nanshan District of Shenzhen as an example,and the zoning map of geological suitability evaluation of underground space resources in Nanshan District is generated by ArcGIS.The evaluation results show that the evaluation model of the most unfavorable grade discrimination method is more suitable for the geological suitability evaluation of Nanshan District,highlighting the restrictive effect of sensitive factors on the development of underground space in Nanshan District.This paper has a certain reference significance for the future model selection of geological suitability evaluation of underground space resources,and provides a certain reference for the planning of underground space in Nanshan District,Shenzhen City.关键词
地下空间资源/地质适宜性评价/评价模型对比/深圳市南山区Key words
underground space resources/geological suitability evaluation/comparison of evaluation models/Nanshan district of Shenzhen引用本文复制引用
郭骏瀚,刘凯..城市地下空间资源地质环境适宜性评价方法对比分析[J].地质论评,2024,70(3):1083-1096,14.基金项目
本文为中国地质调查局项目"罗霄山脉北支地热资源调查"(编号:DD20221677-2)和基本科研业务费专项经费"穹窿构造与环状温泉链循环机制研究"(编号:JKY202004)的成果. Special thanks to the China geological survey project"Luoxiao Mountain north branch geothermal resources survey"(No.DD20221677-2),basic scientific research business special funds"dome structure and ring hot spring chain circulation mechanism research"(No.JKY202004)for funding.Additionally,thank you to everyone who contributed to this study （编号:DD20221677-2）
