| 注册
首页|期刊导航|兰州大学学报(医学版)|胃肠道手术ERAS指南/共识质量评价及内容分析

胃肠道手术ERAS指南/共识质量评价及内容分析

美嘎 杨金拉姆 赵彦会 黄泽平 刘璐 张琰 刘婕婷

兰州大学学报(医学版)2024,Vol.50Issue(4):61-70,10.
兰州大学学报(医学版)2024,Vol.50Issue(4):61-70,10.DOI:10.13885/j.issn.1000-2812.2024.04.010

胃肠道手术ERAS指南/共识质量评价及内容分析

Quality evaluation and content analysis of ERAS guidelines/consensus in gastrointestinal surgery

美嘎 1杨金拉姆 1赵彦会 2黄泽平 2刘璐 1张琰 3刘婕婷3

作者信息

  • 1. 兰州大学 第二临床医学院,甘肃 兰州 730030
  • 2. 兰州大学第二医院普外科,甘肃 兰州 730030
  • 3. 兰州大学第二医院麻醉科,甘肃 兰州 730030
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To evaluate and analyze the guidelines/consensus on enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)in gastrointestinal surgery,and to select the recommended high-quality guidelines/consensus,so as to provide a decision-making basis for the clinical practice of ERAS.Methods We retrieved information from PubMed,Embase,Wanfang,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,other databases and other websites related to the guidelines/consensus.Guidelines/consensus for ERAS in gastrointestinal surgery were included from the establishment of the databases to July 2023.appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluationⅡand reporting items for practice guidelines in healthcare were used to evaluate the quality of the included guidelines/consensus.Recommended high-quality guidelines/consensus were analyzed and recommendations made.Results 8 guidelines and 13 consensuses were included in the study.Based on appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluationⅡ,the standardization of quality evaluation in six fields of average scores was made,respectively for scope and purpose 64.22%±14.47%,participants 29.68%±15.43%,preciseness of for-mulation 30.26%±18.76%,clarity of expres sion 73.68%±19.06%,applicability 10.05%±11.39%and editorial independence 54.46%±36.58%,of which 3 guidelines are recommended for use.Based on the reporting items for practice guidelines in healthcare,guidelines/consensus have serious loss report(report rate<10%)in the fields of guideline background,evidence and recommendations.Based on the three recommended guidelines,24 recommendations containing preoperative,intraoperative and postoperative sections were summarized.Conclusion The quality of the included guidelines/consensus on ERAS in gastrointes tinal surgery is uneven.3 guidelines could be recommended for clinical reference.

关键词

胃肠道手术/加速术后康复/指南/共识/质量评价/指南研究与评估系统Ⅱ/国际实践指南报告规范

Key words

gastrointestinal surgery/enhanced recovery after surgery/guidelines/consensus/quality evaluation/appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation Ⅱ/reporting items for practice guidelines in healthcare

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

美嘎,杨金拉姆,赵彦会,黄泽平,刘璐,张琰,刘婕婷..胃肠道手术ERAS指南/共识质量评价及内容分析[J].兰州大学学报(医学版),2024,50(4):61-70,10.

基金项目

兰州大学第二医院萃英临床拔尖资助项目(CY2020-BJ10) (CY2020-BJ10)

甘肃省自然科学基金资助项目(23JRRA1633) (23JRRA1633)

兰州大学学报(医学版)

OACSTPCD

2097-681X

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文