我国公诉审查制度的反思与完善OACHSSCD
Reflection and Perfection of Public Prosecution Review System in China:From the Perspective of Drawing Lessons from German Intermediate Procedure
公诉审查在刑事诉讼中具有重要的意义.但是,我国的公诉审查制度难以有效发挥筛选案件的作用,在对公诉权的控制上存在不足,而且对被追诉人的权利保障水平较低.相比而言,德国中间程序在审查筛选、权力约束和权利保障方面均具有一定优势.以其为借鉴,为了实现尊重和保障人权的诉讼任务,契合以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革要求,促进少捕慎诉慎押刑事政策的贯彻落实,应在公诉审查中赋予被追诉人提出异议的权利、构建公诉案件的实质审查制度并优化对公诉权的约束机制.
Public prosecution review is of great significance in criminal proceedings.But China's public prosecution review system can't effectively play the role of screening cases,there are deficiencies in the control of public prosecution,and the level of rights protection of the prosecuted is low.In contrast,the German intermediate procedure has advantages in examination and screening,power restriction and rights protection.Taking it as a reference,in order to real…查看全部>>
刘邦泰
中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京 100088
政治法律
公诉审查制度中间程序实质审查
public prosecution review systemintermediate proceduresubstantive examination
《丽水学院学报》 2024 (3)
58-65,8
评论