QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus与QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube在骨关节结核辅助诊断中的比较研究OA北大核心CSTPCD
Comparison of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus with QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube assay in auxiliary diagnosis of osteoarticular tuberculosis
目的:评价 QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus(简称"QFT-Plus")和 QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube(简称"QFT-GIT")检测辅助诊断骨关节结核的应用价值及其检测结果的一致性.方法:选取2023年4-9月于首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院就诊的骨关节结核患者88例作为观察组,非结核性骨关节疾病患者123例作为对照组.所有研究对象同时行外周血QFT-Plus和QFT-GIT检测.分析QFT-Plus和QFT-GIT辅助诊断骨关节结核的价值,评价两种方法检测结果的一致性.结果:211例研究对象中,剔除4例检测为不确定结果者,最终将207例研究对象检测结果纳入诊断性能评估(观察组86例,对照组121例).QFT-Plus检测的敏感度为95.3%(95%CI:87.9%~98.5%),特异度为 70.2%(95%CI:61.2%~78.0%),阳性预测值为 65.5%(95%CI:60.2%~77.5%),阴性预测值为 95.5%(95%CI:88.3%~98.6%);QFT-GIT 检测的敏感度为 91.9%(95%CI:83.4%~96.4%),特异度为 66.9%(95%CI:57.7%~75.1%),阳性预测值为 66.4%(95%CI:57.1%~74.6%),阴性预测值为 92.0%(95%CI:83.8%~96.5%).QFT-Plus 和 QFT-GIT 检测结果的总一致率为 91.8%(95%CI:88.1%~95.5%),阳性一致率为 92.4%(95%CI:87.7%~97.2%),阴性一致率为 90.9%(95%CI:84.9%~96.9%),一致性检验 Kappa 值为 0.832(95%CI:0.756~0.908,P<0.001).结论:QFT-Plus 与 QFT-GIT 检测结果具有良好的一致性,在骨关节结核诊断中具有相似的辅助诊断效能.
Objective:To assess the utility and concordance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus(QFT-Plus)and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube(QFT-GIT)assays in the adjunctive diagnosis of osteoarticular tuberculosis.Methods:Between April and September 2023,88 patients diagnosed with osteoarticular tuberculosis at the Beijing Chest Hospital,affiliated with Capital Medical University,were enrolled as the observation group,while 123 individuals presenting with non-tuberculous osteoarticular conditions comprised the control group.Each participant underwent concurrent peripheral blood assays using both the QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT.This study evaluated the diagnostic utility and result concordance of the two tests in aiding the diagnosis of osteoarticular tuberculosis.Results:Of the 211 initial participants,4 were excluded due to indeterminate results,leaving 207 subjects for analysis(86 in the observation group and 121 in the control).The QFT-Plus assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 95.3%(95%CI:87.9%-98.5%),specificity of 70.2%(95%CI:61.2%-78.0%),positive predictive value of 65.5%(95%CI:60.2%-77.5%),and negative predictive value of 95.5%(95%CI:88.3%-98.6%).The QFT-GIT assay recorded a sensitivity of 91.9%(95%CI:83.4%-96.4%),specificity of 66.9%(95%CI:57.7%-75.1%),positive predictive value of 66.4%(95%CI:57.1%-74.6%),and negative predictive value of 92.0%(95%CI:83.8%-96.5%).The overall concordance between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT results was 91.8%(95%CI:88.1%-95.5%),with a positive agreement of 92.4%(95%CI:87.7%-97.2%)and a negative agreement of 90.9%(95%CI:84.9%-96.9%).The Kappa coefficient for agreement was 0.832(95%CI:0.756-0.908,P<0.001).Conclusion:The QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT assays demonstrated substantial concordance and comparable diagnostic efficacy in the auxiliary evaluation of osteoarticular tuberculosis.
贾红彦;李自慧;潘丽萍;范俊;孙琦;宋瑞雪;杜博平;董静;王颖超;邢爱英;朱传智
耐药结核病研究北京市重点实验室/首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院/北京市结核病胸部肿瘤研究所,北京 101149
临床医学
结核,骨关节诊断,鉴别免疫学试验评价研究
Tuberculosis,osteoarticularDiagnosis,differentialImmunologic testsEvaluation studies
《中国防痨杂志》 2024 (006)
648-653 / 6
北京市自然科学基金(L234055);通州区科技计划项目(KJ2022CX042);北京市医院管理中心青年职工创新工作室-创新梦工场(202136);通州区运河计划人才项目(YH202001) Beijing Natural Science Foundation(L234055);Tongzhou Science and Technology Project(KJ2022CX042);Beijing Hospitals Authority Innovation Studio of Young Staff Funding Support(202136);Tongzhou Yunhe Project(YH202001)
评论