短正中切口入路和迷你切口入路行内侧单髁关节置换的疗效对比研究OACSTPCD
Comparison of efficacy of short median incision approach and mini-incision approach for medial unicompart-mental knee arthroplasty
目的 比较短正中切口入路和迷你切口入路行内侧单髁关节置换患者的手术疗效.方法 纳入解放军九六〇医院2012年4月至2016年7月应用Oxford第三代人工单髁关节治疗膝内侧间室骨性关节炎患者65例,其中采用迷你切口入路患者31例,采用短正中切口入路患者34例.比较2组患者术后切口愈合情况和随访情况;统计两种切口入路的手术操作时间,运用Gross方程计算术中及术后的失血总量.统计术后下地时间,术前、术后1 d、术后1周和术后1个月的VAS评分,以及术前、术后1个月、术后3个月和末次随访时的美国特种外科医院(HSS)评分.结果 术后3例既往糖尿病患者切口延迟愈合;迷你切口组术后6个月1例患者衬垫脱位,术后3年内3例患者因其他内科疾病死亡,假体5年生存率为93.85%.迷你切口组术前股四头肌肌力平均为(3.10±0.60)级,术后下地时间平均为(1.32±0.35)d;短正中切口组术前股四头肌肌力平均为(3.18±0.63)级,术后下地时间平均为(1.37±0.41)d.2组患者术后下地时间、手术操作时间、术中及术后失血总量、VAS评分及HSS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 短正中切口入路和迷你切口入路行内侧单髁关节置换手术的近远期临床疗效相当;短正中切口入路术中暴露更清晰,可以更好地处理髌股关节,为更改手术提供了条件;迷你切口入路患者接受度高,尽可能避免了软组织的损伤,两者各有优势.
objective To compare the surgical effect of short median incision approach and mini-incision approach in patients with medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Methods A total of 65 patients with knee medial compartment osteoarthritis were treated with Oxford third-generation artificial unicondylar joint from April 2012 to July 2016 in PLA 960 hospital were enrolled.Among them,31 patients were treated with mini-incision approach and 34 patients were treated with short median incision approach.The postoperative incision healing and follow-up status of patients in the two groups were compared.The operating time of two incision approaches was counted,and the total blood loss during and after operation were calculated by Gross equation.The time to get out of bed after operation,the visual analogue scale(VAS)scores before operation,1 day after operation,1 week after operation and 1 month after operation,and the hospital for special surgery(HSS)scores before operation,1 month after operation,3 months after operation and at the last follow-up were counted.Results Three patients with previous diabetes had delayed incision healing after surgery,one patient in the mini-incision group suffered pad dislocation 6 months after operation,and three patients died of other medical diseases within 3 years after operation.The 5-year survival rate of the prosthesis was 93.85%.In the mini-incision group,the average preoperative muscle strength of quadriceps femoris was(3.10±0.60)level,and the average postoperative time to get out of bed was(1.32±0.35)days;In the short median incision group,the average preoperative muscle strength of quadriceps femoris was(3.18±0.63)level,and the average postoperative time to get out of bed was(1.37±0.41)days.There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative time to get out of bed,operation time,total blood loss during and after operation,VAS score,HSS score of patients between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The short median incision approach and mini-incision approach for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have similar clinical effects.The short median incision approach has clearer exposure during operation,and the patellofemoral joint can be better treated,which provides conditions for modifying the surgery;the mini-incision approach is highly accepted by patients and minimizes soft tissue damage.Both of them have their own advantages.
张宁;鞠晓聪;王冰;孙海宁
山东第一医科大学第三附属医院骨科,山东 济南 250000解放军九六〇医院骨科,山东 济南 250000
临床医学
迷你切口入路短正中切口入路单髁关节置换临床疗效
mini-incision approachshort median incision approachunicompartmental knee arthroplastyclinical efficacy
《局解手术学杂志》 2024 (006)
505-508 / 4
评论