短正中切口入路和迷你切口入路行内侧单髁关节置换的疗效对比研究OACSTPCD
Comparison of efficacy of short median incision approach and mini-incision approach for medial unicompart-mental knee arthroplasty
目的 比较短正中切口入路和迷你切口入路行内侧单髁关节置换患者的手术疗效.方法 纳入解放军九六〇医院2012年4月至2016年7月应用Oxford第三代人工单髁关节治疗膝内侧间室骨性关节炎患者65例,其中采用迷你切口入路患者31例,采用短正中切口入路患者34例.比较2组患者术后切口愈合情况和随访情况;统计两种切口入路的手术操作时间,运用Gross方程计算术中及术后的失血总量.统计术后下地时间,术前、术后1 d、术后1周和术后1个月的VAS评分,以及…查看全部>>
objective To compare the surgical effect of short median incision approach and mini-incision approach in patients with medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Methods A total of 65 patients with knee medial compartment osteoarthritis were treated with Oxford third-generation artificial unicondylar joint from April 2012 to July 2016 in PLA 960 hospital were enrolled.Among them,31 patients were treated with mini-incision approach and 34 patients were treated…查看全部>>
张宁;鞠晓聪;王冰;孙海宁
山东第一医科大学第三附属医院骨科,山东 济南 250000山东第一医科大学第三附属医院骨科,山东 济南 250000解放军九六〇医院骨科,山东 济南 250000解放军九六〇医院骨科,山东 济南 250000
临床医学
迷你切口入路短正中切口入路单髁关节置换临床疗效
mini-incision approachshort median incision approachunicompartmental knee arthroplastyclinical efficacy
《局解手术学杂志》 2024 (6)
505-508,4
评论