现代科学仪器2024，Vol.41Issue(3)：88-93,6.
急性ST段抬高心肌梗死不同治疗方式的临床疗效观察
The clinical efficacy of different treatment methods for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
摘要
Abstract
Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy of different treatment methods for STEMI.Method:Clinical data of 106 STEMI patients in our hospital from May 2018 to June 2020 were selected and divided into emergency PCI group,early PCI group after thrombolysis,and selective PCI group after thrombolysis according to treatment methods.The clinical efficacy of the three groups of patients was compared.Results:there was a statistically significant difference in LVDd,LVEF,NGF,and cMyBP-C among the three groups(P<0.05);At 7 days and 6 months after treatment,the LVDd emergency PCI group was lower than the other two groups,while the LVEF emergency PCI group was higher than the other two groups(P<0.05);The NGF and cMyBP-C levels in the emergency PCI group after PCI were lower than those in the other two groups(P<0.05);There was no statistically significant difference in TIMI blood flow classification among the three groups(P>0.05).The overall incidence of adverse events in the emergency PCI group was lower than the other two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion:Different timing of PCI has varying degrees of improvement in cardiac function in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.However,emergency PCI has a significant improvement effect on NGF and cMyBP-C in patients,and there are fewer adverse reactions.For patients with indications,PCI should be performed as early as possible in clinical practice..关键词
急性ST段抬高/心肌梗死/经皮冠状动脉介入/溶栓Key words
acute ST-segment elevation/myocardial infarction/percutaneous coronary intervention/thrombolysis引用本文复制引用
闪晶晶,赵影鹏,倪咸赟..急性ST段抬高心肌梗死不同治疗方式的临床疗效观察[J].现代科学仪器,2024,41(3):88-93,6.基金项目
2021年安徽省重点研发与开发计划项目,项目编号:2021-230号 （）
