|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|中国药物经济学|蒲元和胃胶囊治疗功能性消化不良的系统评价与药物经济学评价

蒲元和胃胶囊治疗功能性消化不良的系统评价与药物经济学评价OA

Meta-analysis of Puyuan Hewei Capsule in Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 对蒲元和胃胶囊治疗功能性消化不良(FD)的有效性、安全性与经济性进行评价.方法 全面检索中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据知识服务平台、中文期刊全文数据库、中国生物医学文献服务系统、PubMed、Cochrane Library、Springer Link、Embase数据库中的临床随机对照试验(RCT),检索时间为建库至 2023 年 9 月.采用Cochrane Handbook中的偏倚风险评估工具和RevMan软件进行文献质量评价与Meta分析,采用成本-效果分析法进行药物经济学评价.结果 纳入5 项RCTs,共计503 例患者.系统评价结果显示,蒲元和胃胶囊联合多潘立酮较单独使用多潘立酮[RR=1.20,95%CI(1.10~1.30),Z=4.28,P<0.000 1]、蒲元和胃胶囊联合盐酸伊托必利片较单独使用盐酸伊托必利片[RR=1.19,95%CI(1.05~1.33),Z=2.83,P=0.005]治疗FD的总有效率更优;蒲元和胃胶囊联合盐酸伊托必利片较单独使用盐酸伊托必利片治疗FD的上腹胀评分[MD=-0.44,95%CI(-0.70~-0.19),Z=3.39,P=0.000 7]、嗳气评分[MD=-0.72,95%CI(-0.80~-0.64),Z=18.07,P<0.000 01]、食欲不振评分[MD=-0.30,95%CI(-0.34~-0.25),Z=12.73,P<0.000 01]、早饱评分[MD=-0.34,95%CI(-0.62~-0.05),Z=2.32,P=0.02]均更低,差异有统计学意义.蒲元和胃胶囊与盐酸伊托必利片联合用药与单独使用盐酸伊托必利片的上腹痛评分相比[MD=-0.35,95%CI(-0.83~0.13),Z=1.41,P=0.16],差异无统计学意义.蒲元和胃胶囊联合西药组与单独使用西药组治疗FD的不良反应发生率相比[RR=1.40,95%CI(0.46~4.22),Z=0.60,P=0.55],差异无统计学意义.药物经济学评价结果显示,蒲元和胃胶囊联合多潘立酮较单独使用多潘立酮治疗FD的临床疗效总有效率的增量成本-效果比(ICER)为18.78;蒲元和胃胶囊联合盐酸伊托必利片较单独使用盐酸伊托必利片治疗FD的临床疗效总有效率、上腹胀评分、嗳气评分、食欲不振评分、早饱评分的 ICER 分别为 14.48、-507.28、-310、-744、-656.47;敏感性分析证实了成本-效果分析结果的稳定性.结论 蒲元和胃胶囊治疗FD具有较好的有效性、安全性和经济性.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy,safety and economy of Puyuan Hewei capsule in the treatment of functional dyspepsia(FD).Methods A thorough search was performed across various databases including CNKI,SinoMed,WanFang,VIP,PubMed,Cochrane Library,Springer Link,and Embase.The search aimed to identify clinical randomized controlled trials(RCTs)on the combined use of Puyuan Hewei Capsule for treating functional dyspepsia.The search covered data until September 2023.Literature quality assessment and meta-analysis were conducted using the Cochrane Handbook's bias risk assessment tool and RevMan.Results A total of 503 patients were included in 5 RCTs.Meta-analysis results showed that,Puyuan Hewei capsule combined with domperidone is better than Domperidone[RR=1.20,95%CI(1.10~1.30),Z=4.28,P<0.000 1),Puyuan Hewei capsule combined with Itopride hydrochloride tablets than itopride hydrochloride tablets[RR=1.19,95%CI(1.05~1.33),Z=2.83,P=0.005].Puyuan Hewei capsule combined with Itopride hydrochloride tablets were lower than Itopride hydrochloride tablets in upper abdominal distension score[MD=-0.44,95%CI(-0.70~-0.19),Z=3.39,P=0.000 7],belching score[MD=-0.72,95%CI(-0.80~-0.64),Z=18.07,P<0.000 01],loss of appetite score[MD=-0.30,95%CI(-0.34~-0.25),Z=12.73,P<0.000 01]and early satiety score[MD=-0.34,95%CI(-0.62~-0.05),Z=2.32,P=0.02],and the differences were statistically significant.The epigastric pain score of Puyuan Hewei capsule combined with Itopride hydrochloride tablets was lower than that of Itopride hydrochloride tablets in the treatment of FD[MD=-0.35,95%CI(-0.83,0.13),Z=1.41,P=0.16],and the difference was not statistically significant.There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions in the treatment of FD between Puyuan and Wei capsule combined with Western medicine group and Western medicine group alone[RR=1.40,95%CI(0.46~4.22),Z=0.60,P=0.55].The results of pharmacoeconomic evaluation showed that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER)of total effective rate in the treatment of FD in combination with Puyuan and Wei capsule was 18.78 compared with domperidone alone.Compared with Itopride hydrochloride tablets alone,the ICER of total effective rate,upper abdominal distension score,belching score,loss of appetite score,and early satiety score were 14.48,-507.28,-310,-744,and-656.47,respectively.Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of cost-effectiveness analysis results.Conclusion Puyuan Hewei Capsule has good efficacy,safety and economy in the treatment of FD.

杨倩;潘婕;韩千禧;张欣颖;朱文涛

北京中医药大学管理学院,北京 102488北京中医药大学中医学院,北京 102488

临床医学

蒲元和胃胶囊功能性消化不良系统评价药物经济学评价

Puyuan Hewei CapsuleFunctional DyspepsiaSystematic evaluationPharmacoeconomic evaluation

《中国药物经济学》 2024 (005)

5-13 / 9

中央高校基本科研业务专项资助项目(2020-JYB-ZDGG-072)

10.12010/j.issn.1673-5846.2024.05.001

评论