18份胡柚种质果实品质分析与综合评价OA北大核心CSTPCD
Fruit quality analysis and comprehensive evaluation of 18 Huyou(Citrus changshanensis)accessions
[目的]分析不同胡柚种质间的果实品质差异,建立并应用果实品质评价体系,筛选优良胡柚种质.[方法]以18份胡柚种质为试验材料,对单果质量、可食率、种子数量、果形指数等果实外在品质指标以及可溶性固形物、可滴定酸含量等内在品质指标进行测定,应用感官评定对果实皮色、肉质、剥皮难易等感官指标进行分析,并利用层次分析法对胡柚果实品质进行综合评价.[结果]不同胡柚种质间果实品质性状存在差异,变异系数为3.07%~143.57%,分别以果形指数和种子数为最小和最大.单果质量为184.32~423.20 g;果实为圆形,果形指数平均为0.89;果皮厚度和可食率分别为2.15~9.68 mm和50.33%~83.67%;可溶性固形物和可滴定酸含量(w,后同)分别为9.83%~15.40%和0.90%~1.57%;总酚含量为13.83~20.07 mg·g-1,类胡萝卜素总量为2.29~8.66 μg·g-1;果实剥皮难易程度也存在较大差别.采用层次分析法构建了胡柚果实品质综合评价模型,通过1~9标度法计算得到各品质指标权重,其中甜酸风味权重最高,为17.65%;果形指数最低,为2.29%.根据果实理化分析和感官评定指标的计分规则计算出18份胡柚种质的各指标得分,并结合权重计算总得分,发现01-7b、01-7a、胡柚优株b、胡柚优株a和果5的总得分高,综合品质优异,可作为胡柚新品种利用或作为进一步选育的基础.[结论]不同胡柚种质间果实品质差异较大;建立了胡柚果实品质综合评价体系,具有指标全覆盖和权重赋分合理等优点;对18份胡柚种质进行了品质评价,筛选出5份综合品质优异的种质.
[Objective]Huyou(Citrus changshanensis K.S.Chen et C.X.Fu)is a local characteristic citrus resource in China.The main production area is in Changshan county,Quzhou City,Zhejiang prov-ince.Huyou has a history of commercial cultivation for over a hundred years,and now huyou has be-come a key industry of characteristic agriculture in Changshan county and an important source of in-come for local fruit growers.The evaluation of fruit quality is an important part of phenotypic character-ization of huyou accessions,and also an important basis for screening excellent germplasm accessions.Currently in huyou,no systematic analysis and evaluation of fruit quality differences among different accessions have been carried out,and meanwhile,a comprehensive fruit quality evaluation system has not been developed,which impair the selection and industrial application of excellent accessions.The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the fruit quality of huyou,to establish a fruit quality evaluation system,and to provide a basis for the selection of high quality accessions.[Methods]Eigh-teen huyou accessions,with one typical tree for each accession,were involved in this study.For each tree,fifteen fruit evenly distributed in the crown were harvested when fruit were at commercial harvest maturity.A number of quality indicators,including the average fruit weight(AFW),fruit shape index(FSI),edible rate(ER),pericarp thickness,soluble solids content(SSC),titratable acid content(TAC),SSC/TAC ratio,vitamin C(Vc)content,flavanone neohesperidosides(FNs)content,flavanone rutino-sides(FRs)content,and the contents of total phenolics,etc.,were measured.SPSS and Excel were used for data analysis.Systematic description and sensory evaluation were used to analyze the fruit quality indicators such as peel appearance,flesh texture and peeling ability.The weights of quality indicators were determined by analytic hierarchy process(AHP),and the overall fruit quality of different acces-sions were evaluated and ranked by comprehensive score.[Results]The fruit quality of the 18 Huyou accessions varied in different degree,with coefficients of variation ranging from 3.07%to 143.57%for the different quality indicators analysed.Among all indicators,the number of seeds per fruit had the largest variation and the FSI had the smallest.The AFW ranged from 184.32 to 423.20 g,with Hongrou Huyou having the largest AFW and Guo 4 having the smallest.The longitudinal fruit diameter of all ac-cessions was smaller than the transverse fruit diameter,and thus the FSI was less than 1,with an aver-age of 0.89.Pericarp thickness and ER ranged from 2.15 to 9.68 mm and from 50.33%to 83.67%,re-spectively.The number of seeds per fruit varied greatly among the different accessions,with Cuihong having the lowest number,0.22,while Guo 16 had the highest number,22.67.SSC ranged from 9.83%to 15.40%,with Guo 4 being highest.TAC ranged from 0.90%to 1.57%,with Guo 8 having the highest TAC and Hongrou Huyou having the lowest.The SSC/TAC ratio varied widely among accessions,with the highest value of 12.73 for Guo 18 and the lowest value of 7.91 for Guo 7.The Vc content ranged from 35.88 to 72.95 mg·100 g-1.Guo 10 had the highest content of FNs,a class of bitter flavonoids,while Cuihong had the highest content of FRs,a class of non-bitter flavonoids,but non-detectable FNs,in consistency with the bitter flavor feeling of different accessions.The total carotenoids varied greatly among different accessions with contents ranging from 2.29 to 8.66 μg·g-1,and for the total phenolics,from 13.83 to 20.07 mg·g-1.The peeling ability of the fruit varied widely with Huyou elite plant a,with Hongrou Huyou,Guo 2 and Guo 11 being the easiest.A comprehensive evaluation model of fruit quali-ty was constructed by AHP analysis and the weights of each quality indicator were calculated by 1 to 9 scale method.In this evaluation model,sweetness and sourness were given the highest weight,17.65%,and fruit shape index was given the lowest,2.29%.Based on the average value,maximum value and minimum value of each indicator,the variation of each measured indicator was determined,and mean-while,fruit quality indicators such as peel appearance,flesh texture and peeling ability were scored via systematic description and sensory evaluation.Finally,based on the score and the weight of each indica-tor,the accessions were evaluated for overall fruit quality.The results showed that 01-7b,01-7a,Huyou elite plant b,Huyou elite plant a and Guo 5 were the top five accessions with excellent overall fruit qual-ity.Moreover,Cuihong is an ideal resource for breeding low bitter Huyou while Guo 10 is probably fa-vorable to be used as a raw resource for production of traditional Chinese medicine Quzhou Aurantii Fructus(Qu Zhi Qiao).These can satisfy the demand for diversity in consumption.[Conclusion]The fruit quality of the analyzed 18 different accessions varied greatly.On the basis of the external and inter-nal qualities,an AHP method was used to comprehensively evaluate the fruit quality,and as a result,five accessions with excellent overall quality were selected.The method established in this study im-proves the accuracy and effectiveness for the comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of Huyou,and provides a reference for further selection and breeding of elite Huyou accessions.
张慧艺;汪丽霞;吴伊静;毕旭灿;王刚;赵四清;徐昌杰;陈昆松
浙江大学农业与生物技术学院园艺系,杭州 310058常山县农业特色产业发展中心,浙江常山 324000全省园艺作物品质调控重点实验室,杭州 310058浙江大学农业与生物技术学院园艺系,杭州 310058||全省园艺作物品质调控重点实验室,杭州 310058
园艺学与植物营养学
胡柚果实品质层次分析法综合评价
Huyou(Citrus changshanensis)Fruit qualityAnalytic hierarchy process(AHP)Compre-hensive evaluation
《果树学报》 2024 (006)
1033-1043 / 11
浙江省"三农九方"科技协作计划项目(2022SNJF083);浙江大学全国农业科技现代化先行县(常山)建设项目(588970-Y12202);衢州市科技计划项目(2022K25)
评论