|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|经济与管理研究|政府引导基金、政府补贴与企业创新:效应差异与互补影响

政府引导基金、政府补贴与企业创新:效应差异与互补影响OA北大核心CHSSCDCSSCICSTPCD

Government-guided Funds,Government Subsidies,and Enterprise Innovation:Differences in Effects and Complementary Influences

中文摘要英文摘要

政府引导基金及政府补贴是提升企业创新水平的重要政策工具,明晰二者的效应差异及互补效应对于合理制定产业政策、完善政策体系具有重大意义.本文以 2007-2022 年新三板及A股上市企业为样本,实证研究结果表明:政府引导基金对企业创新的提升效应优于政府补贴,该效应差异在初创期企业、非国有企业、策略性创新企业中通过了显著性检验.进一步,二者作为产业政策组合对企业创新具有互补提升效应,作用机制包括资金融通效应及风险平衡效应.本文从产业政策组合视角揭示了二者对企业创新的效应差异及互补影响,剖析了产业政策介入企业的时机,厘清了政策组合对企业创新的作用机理,对明确产业政策定位、发挥其对企业创新的引导作用具有一定启示.

Government-guided funds and subsidies represent direct intervention and market-oriented industrial policies.The clarity of the differences and synergistic effects bolsters a reasonable development of industrial strategies and augments policy infrastructures.Therefore,this paper endeavors to investigate the variances,symbiotic dynamics,and operational modalities of government-guided funds and subsidies in enterprise innovation.Commencing with an integrated framework of extant industrial stipulations and a strategic policy mix stance,it delves into the disparities among innovation consequences,cooperative interactions,and the mechanisms using microdata of enterprises from 2007 to 2022. The findings indicate that the stimulative impact of government-guided funds on enterprise innovation is greater than that of subsidies.The result remains valid after a series of rigorous robustness tests.These effects are particularly salient within nascent,privately-held,and strategically innovative entities.Furthermore,the research demonstrates a notable reciprocal enhancement between government-guided funds and subsidies,particularly within enterprises at developmental and mid-phases and the private sector,in the eastern region,and those that use specialized and sophisticated technologies to produce novel and unique products.Finally,the industrial policy mix fosters innovation through financial integration and risk balance effects.Therefore,it is necessary to continuously optimize the complementary effects and mechanisms of government-guided funds and subsidies,implement industrial policy combinations in a timely and appropriate manner,and strengthen the guidance of the funds and subsidies for exploratory innovations of enterprises to give full play to the effects of policy combinations. The marginal contributions of this paper manifest as follows.Initially,it brings government-guided funds and subsidies under a common analytical framework and elucidates their distinct effects on innovation at a micro level.Subsequently,the discourse is advanced on the influence of policy mix upon the innovation of micro-enterprises,thereby enriching the comprehension of the nuanced distinctions and collaborative potential underlying governmental incentives and market adoption initiatives.Furthermore,it elucidates the driving forces behind the industrial policy mix and enterprise innovation,holding substantial value for explicitly defining industrial policy roles and enhancing innovation.Finally,it delineates the optimal temporal juncture for policy intervention.Through the application of enterprise life cycle theory,this paper provides valuable insights into the optimal timing of government-guided funds and subsidies,thereby contributing to the development of tailored industry policies,dynamic policy mechanisms,and maximized policy outcomes.

赵天宇;郭树龙

天津财经大学商学院,天津,300222||盈富泰克(深圳)新兴产业投资基金管理有限公司,深圳,518040天津财经大学商学院,天津,300222

经济学

政府引导基金政府补贴政策组合资金融通效应风险平衡效应

government-guided fundgovernment subsidypolicy mixfinancial integration effectrisk balance effect

《经济与管理研究》 2024 (007)

57-76 / 20

国家社会科学基金重点项目"中国制造业关键技术缺失、成因及创新突破路径研究"(19AZD015)

10.13502/j.cnki.issn1000-7636.2024.07.004

评论