|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|安徽医科大学学报|抗核抗体阳性及干预治疗与反复种植失败辅助生殖结局相关性研究

抗核抗体阳性及干预治疗与反复种植失败辅助生殖结局相关性研究OA北大核心CSTPCD

Study on the correlation between positive antinuclear antibody and intervention therapy and assisted reproductive outcome of repeated implantation failure

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨抗核抗体(ANA)阳性及干预治疗对反复种植失败(RIF)患者辅助生殖结局的影响.方法 回顾性研究344例RIF患者,根据ANA检测结果分为ANA阳性组(294例)和阴性对照组(50例),抗核抗体阳性组分为ANA阳性低滴度组(214例)和ANA阳性高滴度组(80例).比较阳性组和阴性组患者的一般临床资料、胚胎相关数据以及妊娠结局.采用Wilcoxon秩和检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和卡方检验的统计学方法来分析ANA对RIF患者辅助生殖结局的影响,并分析了 ANA阳性患者进行干预治疗后的临床妊娠情况.结果 ANA阳性低滴度组和高滴度组患者临床妊娠率均显著低于阴性对照组(P<0.001);ANA阳性患者卵细胞受精率和卵裂率也均显著低于阴性对照组(P<0.05);因ANA阳性胚胎移植后未妊娠患者,经免疫调节剂治疗后的单周期临床妊娠率和累积临床妊娠率均明显提升(P<0.05).结论 与阴性对照组相比,ANA低滴度阳性和高滴度阳性患者的临床妊娠率均下降.经过临床干预治疗后,ANA阳性患者的单周期临床妊娠率和累积妊娠率得到了改善.这表明ANA阳性是RIF的重要原因,而免疫调节剂治疗是改善ANA阳性患者辅助生殖结局的有效措施.

Objective To investigate the impact of positive antinuclear antibody(ANA)and subsequent interven-tion therapy on the assisted reproductive technology outcomes among the patients experiencing recurrent implanta-tion failure(RIF).Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 344 RIF patients.Based on ANA test re-sults,the patients were divided into ANA-positive group(294 cases)and negative control group(50 cases).The ANA-positive group was further divided into a low titer group(214 cases)and a high titer group(80 cases).Com-parative statistical analyses such as the Wilcoxon rank-sum test,Mann-Whitney U test,Kruskal-Wallis test and chi-square test,etc.were employed to evaluate differences in general clinical data,embryo-related parameters,and pregnancy outcomes between the positive and negative groups.The impact of ANA on the assisted reproductive out-comes of patients with recurrent implantation failure was analyzed,and the outcomes of ANA-positive patients after intervention therapy were also analyzed.Results Notably,the clinical pregnancy rates of patients in the ANA-pos-itive low titer group and high titer group were significantly lower than those in the negative control group(P<0.001).Similarly,the rates of fertilization and cleavage of oocytes in ANA-positive patients were also significantly lower than those in the negative control group(P<0.05).For patients who did not achieve pregnancy after embryo transfer due to ANA positivity,immunomodulatory therapy significantly improved both the clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative clinical pregnancy rate(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with the negative control group,the clinical pregnancy rates decrease in both ANA-positive low titer subgroup and high titer subgroup.However,clini-cal intervention therapy enhances the single-cycle clinical pregnancy and cumulative pregnancy rates among ANA-positive patients,indicating that ANA positivity is an important factor in RIF.Immunomodulatory therapy is an ef-fective measure to improve recurrent implantation failure among ANA-positive patients.

肖会;朱雯;杨帆;陈宇鸽;王冠雄;吴欢

安徽医科大学第一附属医院风湿免疫科,合肥 230032安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科,合肥 230032||国家卫生健康委配子及生殖道异常研究重点实验室,合肥 230032

临床医学

抗核抗体不孕症反复种植失败临床结局

antinuclear antibodyinfertilityrepeated implantation failureclinical outcome

《安徽医科大学学报》 2024 (006)

947-951 / 5

国家自然科学基金(编号:81971441);国家自然科学基金(编号:81901541);安徽医科大学研究生科研项目(编号:YJS20230123)

10.19405/j.cnki.issn1000-1492.2024.06.004

评论