安全、健康和环境2024，Vol.24Issue(7)：1-8,8.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7932.2024.07.001
基于文献计量学的人因可靠性分析方法对比研究
Comparative Study on Human Reliability Analysis Methods Based on Bibliometrics
摘要
Abstract
Currently,scholars have extensively ap-plied and improved human reliability analysis meth-ods to evaluate the operational efficiency,reliability,and safety of humans in complex systems.However,selecting the appropriate analysis method among nu-merous human reliability analysis methods requires comparative research.Therefore,by consulting CNKI China Knowledge Infrastructure resources,five com-monly used human reliability analysis methods,namely CREAM,HEART,SLIM,SPAR-H,and THERP,were selected for comparative analysis based on bibliometrics to quantitatively present the applica-tion areas and trends of each human reliability analy-sis method.The results showed that the selection ranking of the five human reliability analysis methods was CREAM>HEART>THERP>SLIM>SPAR-H,in-dicating that CREAM was a relatively high usage e-valuation method.The ranking of human reliability a-nalysis methods obtained in this study can provide ef-fective reference and guidance for the selection and application of future human reliability analysis meth-ods in various fields.关键词
人因可靠性分析/文献计量学/CNKI/CiteSpace/对比分析Key words
human reliability analysis/bibliomet-rics/CNKI/CiteSpace/comparative analysis分类
交通工程引用本文复制引用
施梦洁,张人友,李冉,张丹宸..基于文献计量学的人因可靠性分析方法对比研究[J].安全、健康和环境,2024,24(7):1-8,8.基金项目
北京市教委科技计划项目(KM202210017002),人机交互视角下的高校科研实验风险评估与溯源研究 （KM202210017002）
北京市大学生科研训练项目(2024J00068),高校学生实验室安全意识的多维精准评估研究. （2024J00068）
