|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|草业科学|杂草水提液对3种一年生牧草种子萌发特性和幼苗生长的化感效应

杂草水提液对3种一年生牧草种子萌发特性和幼苗生长的化感效应OA北大核心CSTPCD

Allelopathic effects of water extract from three species of annual forage on seed germination and seedling growth

中文摘要英文摘要

杂草是牧草生产的主要限制因子之一,在牧草建植阶段通过化感效应严重影响出苗效果.本研究以2种农田主要杂草灰绿藜(Chenopodium glaucum)和赖草(Leymus secalinus)为试验材料,在不同浓度水提液(0.25、0.50、0.75、1.00 g·mL-1)下对苏丹草(Sorghum sudanense)、谷子(Setaria italica)和湖南稷子(Echinochloa frumentacea)3 种牧草种子萌发与幼苗生长的化感效应进行分析.结果表明:灰绿藜和赖草水提液对3种一年生牧草萌发和幼苗生长表现出不同程度的抑制作用,效果随浓度提高而增强.在牧草种子萌发期间,杂草水提液的影响主要体现在萌发率下降和延缓萌发时间方面,谷子萌发被赖草和灰绿藜完全抑制的预测阈值为0.3~0.6g·mL-1,而苏丹草和湖南稷子为0.9~1.2g·mL-1.在牧草幼苗生长过程中,2种杂草水提液对3种牧草地上和地下部分生长均有影响,其中赖草水提液对湖南稷子的幼苗的影响呈现低浓度(低于0.75 g·mL-1)同时影响根和苗的生长、高浓度(0.75~1.00 g·mL-1)根和苗生长抑制作用不一致现象;湖南稷子对灰绿藜和赖草水提液化感作用抗性分别在低于0.50和0.25 g·mL-1浓度表现较高,而谷子最弱,主要表现在根长和苗长受抑制影响最大.虽然3种供试牧草都受到2种杂草浸提液的化感抑制,但各牧草幼苗生长对其化感作用耐受能力有差异.其中苏丹草和湖南稷子对2种杂草浸提液的耐受阈值相同(0~0.75 g·mL-1),高于谷子的耐受阈值(0~0.25 g·mL-1).本研究表明化感效应可以通过影响萌发策略,调控地上、地下生长行为,抑制牧草苗期建植.苏丹草和湖南稷子在对抗灰绿藜和赖草方面具有较好的潜力,种植这2种抗性较强的牧草,可以减少杂草的影响,为牧草生产中地建植管理提供了科学依据.

Weeds are one of the main limiting factors of forage production that seriously affect seedling emergence via the allelopathic effect in the planting stage of forage.In this study,two major weeds in farmland(Chenopodium glaucum and Leymus secalinus)with four set gradients(0.25,0.50,0.75,and 1.00 g·mL-1)of water extract were used as test materials to evaluate the allelopathy effect on the germination of Sorghum sudanense,Setaria italica,and Echinochloa frumentacea seeds.The water extract of C.glaucum and L.secalinus showed different inhibitory effects on the germination and growth of three annual forages,and the effect increased with increasing concentrations of the extracts.During forage seed germination,the effects of water extracts of the two weeds on the seeds of the three forages were primarily reflected in the reduction of the germination rate and the delay in germination time.The predicted thresholds for the complete inhibition of S.italica by C.glaucum and L.secalinus were 0.3~0.6 g·mL-1,whereas those ofS,sudanense and E.frumentacea were 0.9~1.2 g·mL-1.During forage seedling growth,the two weed water extracts influenced the aboveground and underground growth of the three forages.The low concentration of L.secalinus water extracts(less than 0.75 g·mL-1)simultaneously affected the growth of E.frumentacea roots and seedlings,whereas the high concentration(1.00 g·mL-1)showed inconsistent inhibitory effects on the growth of roots and seedlings.E.frumentacea exhibited higher allelopathic resistance to the two weed water extracts at concentrations below 0.50 and 0.25 g·mL-1,whereas S.italica displayed weaker resistance primarily manifested in root length and seedling length inhibition.Although all three test forages were chemically inhibited by the two weed extracts,the seedling growth of each forage differed in their ability to tolerate their chemotaxis.The tolerance thresholds of S.sudanense and E.frumentacea to the two weed extracts were the same(0~0.75 g·mL-1)and higher than those of.S.italica(0~0.25 g·mL-1).This study demonstrates that allelopathic effects can impede forage seedling establishment by influencing germination strategies,regulate aboveground and underground growth behavior,and inhibit their overall establishment.S.sudanense and E.frumentacea exhibit promising potential in combating C.glaucum and L.secalinus,respectively;planting these two more resistant forages could effectively mitigate weed impact,thereby providing a scientific foundation to establish and manage forage production.

陈国豪;杨光;刘琪琪;陈泽林;侯帅;孙兴荣;张志新;付娟娟

西北农林科技大学草业与草原学院,陕西杨凌 712100

杂草水提液牧草种子萌发特性幼苗生长一年生牧草化感作用

weedswater extractsforage seedgermination characteristicsseedling growthannual forageallelopathy

《草业科学》 2024 (007)

1690-1701 / 12

博士科研启动费项目(2452020133)

10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2024-0109

评论