|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|影像科学与光化学|产前多超声参数评估胎儿生长受限的价值及诊断假阴性影响因素分析

产前多超声参数评估胎儿生长受限的价值及诊断假阴性影响因素分析OACSTPCD

The Value of Prenatal Multi-ultrasound Parameters in the Evaluation of Fetal Growth Restriction and the Analysis of the Influencing Factors of False Negative Diagnosis

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探究产前彩色多普勒超声评估胎儿生长受限(FGR)的价值,分析超声诊断假阴性的影响因素.方法:选择2019年10月至2023年7月于我院行产前彩色多普勒超声诊断为FGR并获得产后随访确诊的118例胎儿作为FGR真阳性组,60例产前彩色多普勒超声诊断为FGR阴性而产后确诊为FGR的胎儿作为FGR假阴性组.比较首次检查时两组间不同孕周的超声参数;比较两组胎儿的临床资料,采用随机森林算法及多因素Logistic回归分析筛选影响超声诊断FGR假阴性的因素;构建多因素Logistic回归模型并评价其预测效能.结果:孕12~14周假阴性组胎儿的腹围、股骨长明显长于真阳性组,血流收缩末期峰值(S)/舒张末期峰值(D)明显低于真阳性组(P<0.05);孕15~27周假阴性组胎儿的腹围、股骨长明显长于真阳性组(P<0.05);孕28~37周假阴性组胎儿的腹围明显长于真阳性组(P<0.05);随机森林算法及多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,孕期增重高于标准、妊娠糖尿病、胎方位为臀位、分娩胎龄>40周、胎儿性别为男性、腹围增加是影响超声诊断FGR假阴性的危险因素(P<0.05);当模型预测超声诊断FGR假阴性概率为0.85时,约登指数最大(74.46),敏感度为86.45%,特异度为88.01%,逻辑回归拟合优度检验结果显示模型Bootstrap验证前后的Nagelkerke R2=0.602.结论:随着孕周的增加(12~3 7周),首次超声检查诊断FGR真阳性和假阴性胎儿间存在显著差异的指标数量逐渐减少,孕期增重、妊娠糖尿病、胎方位等是影响超声诊断FGR假阴性的危险因素.

Objective:To explore the value of prenatal color Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of fetal growth restriction(FGR)and analyze the influencing factors of false negative ultrasound diagnosis.Methods:From October 2019 to July 2023,118 fetuses diagnosed as FGR by prenatal color Doppler ultrasound and confirmed by postpartum follow-up were selected as the true positive group of FGR,and 60 fetuses with negative FGR diagnosed by prenatal color Doppler ultrasound and postpartum FGR were selected as the false negative group of FGR.The ultrasonic parameters of different gestational weeks between the two groups were compared at the first examination.The clinical data of the two groups of fetuses were compared,and the factors affecting the false negative of FGR diagnosed by ultrasound were screened by random forest algorithm and multivariate Logistic regression analysis.Multi-factor Logistic regression model was constructed and its prediction efficiency was evaluated.Results:At the 12th and 14th week of pregnancy,the abdominal circumference and femoral length of the false negative group were significantly longer than those of the true positive group,and the end systolic peak(S)/end diastolic peak(D)of blood flow in the false negative group was significantly lower than that in the true positive group(P<0.05).At 15-27 weeks of pregnancy,the abdominal circumference and femoral length of the fetus in the false negative group were significantly longer than those in the true positive group(P<0.05).At 28-37 weeks of pregnancy,the abdominal circumference of the fetus in the false negative group was significantly longer than that in the true positive group(P<0.05).The results of random forest algorithm and multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that higher weight gain during pregnancy,gestational diabetes mellitus,breech position,gestational age>40 weeks,male fetus and increased abdominal circumference were the risk factors for false negative FGR diagnosis by ultrasound(P<0.05).When the probability of false negative diagnosis of FGR by model prediction ultrasound is 0.85,the Yoden index is the highest(74.46),the sensitivity is 86.45%,and the specificity is 88.01%.the logical regression goodness-of-fit test results show that Nagelkerke R2 is 0.602 before and after Bootstrap verification of the model.Conclusion:With the increase of gestational weeks(12-37 weeks),the number of differences between true-positive and false-negative fetuses diagnosed by ultrasound for the first time decreased gradually.Weight gain during pregnancy,gestational diabetes and fetal position were the risk factors affecting false-negative diagnosis of FGR by ultrasound.

郭媛;陈小梅;候燕;马淑琴

银川国龙骨科医院超声科,宁夏银川 750004宁夏医科大学总医院产科,宁夏银川 750001

临床医学

胎儿生长受限彩色多普勒超声产前诊断假阴性影响因素

fetal growth restrictioncolor Doppler ultrasoundprenatal diagnosisfalse negativeinfluencing factors

《影像科学与光化学》 2024 (004)

318-326 / 9

宁夏自然科学基金项目(2020AAC03383)

10.7517/issn.1674-0475.2024.04.04

评论