|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|热带地理|生态环境保护中的尺度政治与正义实现:以A市绿中村改造为例

生态环境保护中的尺度政治与正义实现:以A市绿中村改造为例OA北大核心CSTPCD

Environmental Justice and the Politics of Scale under Ecological and Environmental Protection:A Case Study of a Village in the Ecological Protection Zone

中文摘要英文摘要

生态环境保护往往面临着保护责任和发展权益在整体社会与保护区局部群体间公平配置的难题.由于权益配置是不同层级政府与局部群体间博弈的结果,文章引入尺度政治与环境正义的理论框架,梳理用于解析生态环境保护中正义格局形成与演化的逻辑路径,并以中部某省会城市生态保护区内的村庄改造为例进行实证.研究发现:在未事先落实保护区居民发展权益的情况下,自上而下的刚性生态环境保护易造成不同尺度主体间的矛盾,表现为低尺度的居民发展权益受制于高尺度政府主体的保护要求;尺度重构成为前者寻求正义的一种非正规途径,表现为低尺度的居民寻求更高层级政府的介入,将其发展诉求的响应尺度上移,从而赋予发展与保护同等话语权,迎来环境正义实现的契机.诉诸非正规途径寻求正义本身也说明,中国城市生态环境保护中,缺乏保障低尺度群体合理权益的正规途径.文章结合理论与实证研究为此提供了解决思路.

Ecological environmental protection is an important support for China to achieve ecological civilization,but it often encounters challenges in fairly distributing protection responsibilities and development rights between the wider society and local communities living in protected areas.Ecological protection planning is an instrument for reconstructing environmental protection responsibilities and development rights among different social groups:the communities within the protected areas bear the responsibility for ecological protection but may lose some development rights to some extent,whereas the communities outside the protected areas enjoy the benefits of environmental protection without having to fulfill related obligations.This asymmetry of rights and obligations triggers environmental injustice,and is a crucial factor in determining the effectiveness of policy implementation.The changing patterns of environmental(in)justice are shaped by negotiations between governments at different scales and local stakeholders,and involve complex political processes.Therefore,this study introduces a theoretical framework that integrates scale politics and environmental justice to explore the distinctive-scale political processes involved in achieving environmental justice in ecological protection areas under China's segmented and hierarchical political system.First,the pattern of environmental justice is shaped by the highest-scale actors among relevant stakeholders.Second,intermediate-scale actors tend to prioritize compliance with policy directives from higher scales and may use methods such as scale retention or devolution to limit the interest demands of lower scales.Finally,lower-scale actors may seek to enhance their political discourse power through scale escalation when faced with unjust situations created by a top-down decision-making system.Empirically,this research selected a village yet to be reconstructed in an ecological protection zone in the central provincial capital city of China as a case study and analyzed the environmental injustice faced by the villagers and pathways to change the injustice.The empirical findings suggest that,without prior consideration of the development rights of local residents,strict top-down ecological environmental protection methods often aggravate tense relationships among actors at different scales.Specifically,this leads to environmental injustice,in which the development rights of local residents at lower scales are overshadowed by the protection requirements enforced by higher-scale government entities.Environmental(in)justice includes the allocation,institutional,and recognition dimensions.In response,scale reconstruction emerges as an informal strategy for lower-scale residents to seek justice.Through this strategy,lower-scale residents appeal to higher-scale governments to intervene in the development issues of ecological protection areas,and thus strive to achieve equality in development rights and protective responsibilities.This process opens a way to achieve environmental justice.Additionally,the reliance on informal mechanisms underscores the lack of formal mechanisms in China to ensure that lower-scale groups have fair rights to urban ecological environmental protection.To address the challenges,this article integrates theoretical insights with empirical evidence to propose the following policy measures:(1)strengthening the top-down transmission of policies to implement the principle of balancing ecological protection by improving people's livelihoods,(2)establishing mechanisms for achieving environmental justice through the balanced allocation of rights and responsibilities,and(3)enhancing the democratic participation of relevant stakeholders in planning.

郭炎;杜汝旭;黄经南;王博然;周俊

武汉大学 城市设计学院,武汉 430072||湖北省人居环境工程技术研究中心,武汉 430072武汉大学 城市设计学院,武汉 430072

土木建筑

环境正义尺度重构尺度政治生态保护村庄改造

environmental justicerescalingpolitics of scaleecological protectionvillage redevelopment

《热带地理》 2024 (008)

1376-1386 / 11

国家自然科学基金(41971185、52378074);国家社科基金重大项目(23&ZD114)

10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.20230868

评论