|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|水利水电技术(中英文)|基于代谢理论的城市群水资源承载力综合评价

基于代谢理论的城市群水资源承载力综合评价OA北大核心CSTPCD

Comprehensive evaluation of water resources carrying capacity of urban agglomerations based on the metabolic theory

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]随着中国城市群的可持续发展,水资源短缺和时空分布不均等问题日益突出,水资源承载力对城市群的可持续发展具有重要的理论和现实意义[方法]基于区域水资源代谢理论,构建综合考虑区域水资源特征、社会经济系统特征和可持续发展原则的评价指标体系,采用TOPSIS计算了2019 年京津冀城市群(BTHUA)的水资源承载力(WRCC)指数.在综合分析区域水资源现状的基础上,提出了提高区域水资源承载力的建议.[结果]结果显示:2019 年BTHUA的整体承载能力指数并不高,北京市(0.5612)、天津市(0.5306)和唐山市(0.4075)评分较高,WRCC处于中等水平,仍有进一步发展的潜力.石家庄市(0.3843)、秦皇岛市(0.3165)、衡水市(0.2952)、承德市(0.2935)和邢台市(0.2674)评分中等,WRCC 达到了临界值,并且发展潜力有限.而廊坊市(0.2214)、邯郸市(0.2188)、张家口市(0.2115)、保定市(0.2086)、沧州市(0.2026)评分偏低,WRCC达到上限,进一步发展的潜力非常有限.[结论]根据物质流分析,(1)水资源系统上,京津冀地区整体水资源生产能力不容乐观,水资源开发潜力不足;(2)社会经济上,BTHUA社会规模已经超过了水资源的承载能力,未来还将继续扩大;(3)生态系统上,除北京、天津、秦皇岛市,其余城市生态用水占比皆达不到标准.该研究考虑整个用水系统,可以得到比其他方法更全面、更准确的水资源承载力状况,可以为制定科学、可持续的水资源发展战略提供参考,并提供水资源利用政策和未来社会经济发展的建议.

[Objective]The sustainable development of urban agglomerations in China has brought forth significant challenges,nota-bly concerning water scarcity and the uneven spatial-temporal distribution of water resources.The concept of water resources carry-ing capacity holds profound theoretical and practical implications for ensuring the sustainability of urban agglomerations.[Meth-ods]Rooted in the regional water resources metabolism theory,an evaluation index system is established that thoroughly considers regional water resource characteristics,socio-economic system features,and principles of sustainable development.The TOPSIS method is employed to compute the Water Resources Carrying Capacity(WRCC)index of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglom-eration(BTHUA)in 2019.Through a comprehensive analysis of the current state of regional water resources,recommendations for enhancing regional water resources carrying capacity are provided.[Results]The result indicate that the overall WRCC index of BTHUA in 2019 is moderate.Beijing(0.5612),Tianjin(0.5306),and Tangshan(0.4075)exhibit relatively higher scores,suggesting a medium WRCC with potential for further development.However,Shijiazhuang(0.3843),Qinhuangdao(0.3165),Hengshui(0.2952),Chengde(0.2935),and Xingtai(0.2674)fall within the medium scores,with WRCC nearing critical val-ues and limited development potential.Conversely,Langfang(0.2214),Handan(0.2188),Zhangjiakou(0.2115),Baoding(0.2086),and Cangzhou(0.2026)exhibit the lowest scores,with WRCC nearing its upper limit and very limited potential for further development.[Conclusion]The study concludes that:(1)Material flow analysis indicates a pessimistic outlook on the wa-ter production capacity of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region,implying insufficient potential for water resources development.(2)So-cietal scale in BTHUA has already surpassed the water resources carrying capacity,with anticipated further expansion in the future.(3)Except for Beijing,Tianjin,and Qinhuangdao,the ecological water usage percentage of other cities fails to meet the standard at the ecosystem level.By offering a comprehensive assessment of water resources carrying capacity,this study provides valuable in-sights for formulating scientifically sound and sustainable water resources development strategies,along with recommendations for water resources utilization policies and future socio-economic development endeavors.

吴嘉伟;刘泓汐;李春晖;易雨君

烟台大学 土木工程学院,山东 烟台 264005北京师范大学 环境学院水环境模拟与污染控制国家重点实验室,北京 100875烟台大学 土木工程学院,山东 烟台 264005||北京师范大学 环境学院水环境模拟与污染控制国家重点实验室,北京 100875

环境科学

水资源承载力京津冀城市群综合评价代谢理论TOPSIS方法水资源时空分布可持续发展

water resources carrying capacityBeijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomerationscomprehensive evaluationmetabolic theoryTOPSIS methodwater resourcestemporal and spatial distributionsustainable development

《水利水电技术(中英文)》 2024 (006)

58-71 / 14

Project supported by the Innovative Research Group of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52221003);the Joint Funds of the Na-tional Natural Science Foundation of China(U2243236);and the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars(52025092) 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(52221003,U2243236,52025092)

10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2024.06.005

评论