| 注册
首页|期刊导航|新医学|双相障碍心理弹性量表的汉化及信效度检验

双相障碍心理弹性量表的汉化及信效度检验

於雪英 窦文博 罗霞 陈敏华 李慧娟 林小玲

新医学2024,Vol.55Issue(6):449-455,7.
新医学2024,Vol.55Issue(6):449-455,7.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0253-9802.2024.06.008

双相障碍心理弹性量表的汉化及信效度检验

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Resilience Questionnaire for Bipolar Disorder

於雪英 1窦文博 2罗霞 3陈敏华 4李慧娟 5林小玲6

作者信息

  • 1. 中山大学护理学院,广东 广州 510080||中山大学附属第三医院护理部,广东 广州 510630
  • 2. 香港理工大学护理学院,香港特别行政区 999077
  • 3. 重庆医科大学护理学院,重庆 400016
  • 4. 中山大学附属第三医院精神(心理)科,广东 广州 510630
  • 5. 中山大学附属第三医院护理部,广东 广州 510630
  • 6. 中山大学护理学院,广东 广州 510080
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To translate the Resilience Questionnaire for Bipolar Disorder(RBD)into Chinese and evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of RBD in Chinese patients with bipolar disorder.Methods The Brislin translation model was used to translate the RBD into Chinese and backtranslate into English,and the Chinese version of RBD was developed after cross-cultural adjustment.A total of 233 outpatients and inpatients with bipolar disorder admitted to two tertiary hospitals in Guangzhou from April,2019 to April,2021 were included to investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of RBD.Results Four factors were extracted from Chinese version of RBD by principal component analysis,and the cumulative contribution rate of variance was 66.68%.The confirmatory factor analysis displayed good fitness(χ 2/df=2.84,RMSEA=0.078,RMR=0.049,GFI=0.913,IFI=0.906,TLI=0.935).The Chinese version of RBD consisted of 23 statements in four dimensions(self-management,turning point,self-care and interpersonal support),with another 2 independent scoring items.The criterion validity was 0.559(P<0.001)when compared with the Chinese version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale.The content validity was 0.987 in total scale(ranged from 0.800 to 1.000 in item level),and scale-level content validity index based on the universal agreement method was 0.913.This scale performed well in the Cronbach's coefficient of the scale(Cronbach's α=0.952)and its dimensions(0.847-0.894),and the split-half reliability was 0.822(P<0.001).Conclusion The Chinese version of RBD has good reliability and validity,which is applicable for the evaluation of resilience in Chinese patients with bipolar disorder.

关键词

双相障碍/心理弹性/量表/文化调试/信度/效度

Key words

Bipolar disorder/Resilience/Scale/Cultural adjustment/Reliability/Validity

引用本文复制引用

於雪英,窦文博,罗霞,陈敏华,李慧娟,林小玲..双相障碍心理弹性量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].新医学,2024,55(6):449-455,7.

基金项目

国家自然科学基金(71904213) (71904213)

新医学

OACSTPCD

0253-9802

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文