|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|中国内镜杂志|关节镜下改良Mason-Allen与缝线桥技术治疗中小型肩袖撕裂的早期疗效比较

关节镜下改良Mason-Allen与缝线桥技术治疗中小型肩袖撕裂的早期疗效比较OACSTPCD

Early effect of arthroscopic modified Mason-Allen and suture-bridge technique for small and medium-size rotator cuff tear

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 比较关节镜下改良Mason-Allen(mMA)与缝线桥技术治疗中小型肩袖撕裂的早期疗效.方法 选取中小型肩袖撕裂患者60例,分为mMA组和缝线桥组,各30例.mMA组采用mMA技术治疗,缝线桥组采用缝线桥技术治疗.比较两组患者手术时间、锚钉数量、术中出血量、肩关节活动度、疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)评分、Constant-Murley评分和再撕裂率.结果 mMA组手术时间短于缝线桥组,术中锚钉使用数量少于缝线桥组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者术中出血量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后,两组患者肩关节活动度较术前增大,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者组间肩关节活动度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后,两组患者VAS较术前降低,ASES评分和Constant-Murley评分较术前增高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者组间VAS、ASES评分和Constant-Murley评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组患者再撕裂率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 关节镜下mMA与缝线桥技术治疗中小型肩袖撕裂的早期疗效相当,但mMA的手术时间更短,锚钉使用量更少.

Objective To compare the early effect of arthroscopic modified Mason-Allen(mMA)and suture-bridge technique for small and medium-size rotator cuff tear.Methods 60 patients with small and medium-size rotator cuff tear were divided into mMA group and suture bridge group,30 cases each.The mMA group was treated with mMA technique,and the suture bridge group was treated with suture-bridge technique.The operative time,the number of anchors used,blood loss,shoulder mobility,pain visual analogue scale(VAS),American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons(ASES)scale,the Constant-Murley score and the rate of re-tear were compared between the two groups.Results The operative time and the number of anchors used in mMA group were less than those in suture bridge group(P<0.05),and there was no difference of blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05).After operation,the shoulder joint motion of two groups was increased compared with before operation(P<0.05),and there was no statistical difference between the two groups(P>0.05).After surgery,VAS of the two groups was lower than that before surgery,ASES scale and Constant-Murley scores were higher than those before surgery(P<0.05),there was no difference in VAS,ASES and Constant-Murley scores between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no difference in re-tear rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Arthroscopic mMA is similar to suture-bridge technique in the treatment of small and medium-size rotator cuff tear,but operative time of mMA is shorter and it requires less anchors.

王立晖;梁汉荣;黄敏华;潘伟汉;臧学慧

华南理工大学附属第六医院(佛山市南海区人民医院) 骨二科,广东 佛山 528200华南理工大学附属第六医院(佛山市南海区人民医院) 手术室,广东 佛山 528200华南理工大学附属第六医院(佛山市南海区人民医院) 超声科,广东 佛山 528200

临床医学

肩袖撕裂关节镜改良Mason-Allen法(mMA)缝线桥技术临床研究

rotator cuff teararthroscopemodified mason-allen method(mMA)suture-bridge techniqueclinical research

《中国内镜杂志》 2024 (007)

16-23 / 8

佛山市自筹经费类科技计划项目(No:2220001004930)

10.12235/E20230559

评论