|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|中国实用神经疾病杂志|尼麦角林联合经颅刺激仪治疗脑卒中后认知障碍患者的疗效及对脑内代谢的影响

尼麦角林联合经颅刺激仪治疗脑卒中后认知障碍患者的疗效及对脑内代谢的影响OACSTPCD

Efficacy of nicergoline combined with TMS in treating patients with post-stroke cognitive dysfunction and its effect on brain metabolism

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 分析尼麦角林联合经颅刺激仪治疗脑卒中后认知障碍患者的疗效及对脑内代谢的影响.方法 选取2020-10-2023-03安徽中医药大学神经病学研究所附属医院收治的脑卒中后认知功能障碍患者197例为观察对象,根据治疗方式分为尼麦角林组(n=99)、联合组(n=98),尼麦角林组给予尼麦角林治疗,联合组给予尼麦角林+经颅刺激仪治疗,比较2组患者疗效、治疗前后认知功能状态(MMSE评分、RBMT评分)、脑内代谢(NAA/Cr、Cho/Cr)及ERP(P300波幅、P300潜伏期)变化,以及2组血清神经损伤标志物(NSE、S-100β、UCH-L1、GFAP)水平.结果 治疗后联合组患者MMSE评分(27.46±4.01比24.19±3.05)、RBMT评分(21.05±4.34比17.38±3.16)均明显高于尼麦角林组(P<0.05).治疗后联合组患者NAA/Cr水平(1.83±0.24比1.62±0.30)明显高于尼麦角林组,Cho/Cr水平(0.91±0.12比1.32±0.21)明显低于尼麦角林组(P<0.05).治疗后联合组患者波幅水平(5.78±1.33比4.61±1.23)明显高于尼麦角林组,潜伏期(207.46±18.92比331.24±16.85)明显低于尼麦角林组(P<0.05).治疗后联合组患者NSE(10.16±2.60比13.26±3.53)、S-100 β(1.59±0.33 比 2.45±0.26)、UCH-L1(53.82±8.03 比 75.29±9.83)、GFAP(10.36±2.10 比14.50±2.39)水平均明显低于尼麦角林组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 尼麦角林联合经颅刺激仪治疗脑卒中后认知功能障碍患者疗效较好,可缩短P300潜伏期,增大波幅,进而改善患者认知功能,其机制可能与提高脑代谢、降低血清神经损伤标志物有关.

Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of nicergoline combined with transcranial stimulator in treating patients with post-stroke cognitive dysfunction and the effect on intracerebral metabolism.Methods Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed,and 197 patients with post-stroke cognitive dysfunction admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of the Institute of Neurology,Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from October 2020 to March 2023 were selected,and were divided into the nicergoline group(n=99)and the combined group(n=98)according to the treatment modality,and nicergoline was given to the nicergoline group,and the combined group was given to the nicergoline+transcranial stimulation device treatment,and the therapeutic efficacy was compared between the two groups.The cognitive function status(mini-mental examination(MMSE)score,Rivermead behavioural memory test(RBMT)score),intracerebral metabolism(NAA/Cr,Cho/Cr)and event related points(ERPs)(P300 wave amplitude,P300 latency)changes were compared,and the levels of serum nerve injury markers(neuron-specific enolase(NSE),S100 protein(S-100 β),ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase-1(UCH-L1),and glial progenitor fibrillary acidic protein(GFAP))were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rates in the nicergoline group and the combination group were 67.68%and 90.82%,respectively,and the total effective rate of treatment for patients in the combination group was significantly higher than that in the nicergoline group(P<0.05).The MMSE score and RBMT score in the combined group after treatment were significantly higher than those of the nicergoline group(P<0.05).The NAA/Cr level of in the combined group after treatment was significantly higher than that of the nicergoline group,and the Cho/Cr level was significantly lower than that of the nicergoline group(P<0.05).The wave amplitude level in the combined group after treatment was significantly higher than that of the nicergoline group,and the latency level was significantly lower than that of the nicergoline group(P<0.05).The levels of NSE,S-100β,UCH-L1 and GFAP in the combined group were significantly lower than those of the nicergoline group after treatment,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Nicergoline combined with transcranial stimulator has better efficacy in treating patients with post-stroke cognitive dysfunction,which can shorten the P300 latency,increase the magnitude,and then improve the cognitive function,and the mechanism may be related to the improvement of cerebral metabolism and the reduction of serum nerve damage markers.

佘晓梅;张亮亮;张黎

安徽中医药大学神经病学研究所附属医院,安徽 合肥 230031

临床医学

脑卒中尼麦角林经颅刺激仪认知障碍脑内代谢

StrokeNicergolineTranscranial stimulatorCognitive dysfunctionBrain metabolism

《中国实用神经疾病杂志》 2024 (008)

966-970 / 5

2022年安徽省自然科学基金项目(编号:2208085QH263)

10.12083/SYSJ.231621

评论