基于COM-B模型的大学生幽门螺杆菌筛查意愿影响因素研究OA北大核心CSTPCD
A study on the influencing factors of college students' willingness to undergo Helicobacter pylori screening based on the COM-B model
目的 以能力、机会、动机—行为(Capability-Opportunity-Motivation Behavior,COM-B)模型为理论框架,了解现阶段我国大学生群体参与幽门螺杆菌筛查的意愿水平及影响因素、路径和作用机制,为制定提高感染筛查水平的干预策略提供参考.方法 采用多阶段分层抽样,选取不同地区的大学生,使用问卷调查法对大学生参与幽门螺杆菌筛查的意愿及影响因素进行调查.统计调查对象的筛查意愿;采用分层回归方法分析影响参与幽门螺杆菌筛查意愿的能力、机会和动机因素;构建结构方程模型,判断模型整体拟合情况,采用中介效应分析法分析能力、机会和动机维度影响因素的具体路径和作用机制.结果 选取山东省和陕西省6个城市的2 242名大学生进行问卷调查.大学生幽门螺杆菌筛查意愿得分为(2.90±1.29)分,处于中等水平.能力因素(健康素养、幽门螺杆菌知识水平),机会因素(社会规范),动机因素(自我效能、预期后悔)对大学生的筛查意愿有显著正向预测作用(P均<0.001).结构方程模型整体拟合效果较好,能力因素(β=0.090)和机会因素(β=0.305)通过动机因素间接影响筛查意愿,动机因素起中介作用.动机维度下的自我效能(β=0.023)和预期后悔(β=0.020)在能力因素与筛查意愿之间发挥中介作用,自我效能(β=0.180)和预期后悔(β=0.073)在机会因素与筛查意愿之间发挥中介作用,各路径关系有统计学意义(P均<0.05).结论 大学生参与幽门螺杆菌筛查的意愿有待提升;能力因素、机会因素和动机因素可显著正向预测幽门螺杆菌筛查意愿;动机维度下的自我效能和预期后悔是能力因素、机会因素与筛查意愿之间的中介变量.建议大学生群体及早参与幽门螺杆菌筛查.
Objective This study aims to investigate the current levels of willingness to participate in Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)screening among college students in China and the influencing factors,pathways,and mechanisms using the COM-B(Capability-Opportunity-Motivation Behavior)model as the theoretical framework.Suggestions to develop intervention strategies to improve infection screening levels are expected to be proposed.Methods By using a multi-stage stratified sampling method,college students from different regions in China were selected.A questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate their willingness to participate in H.pylori screening and its influencing factors.Analyze statistically the screening willingness of the surveyed individuals.Stratified regression analysis was employed to identify the factors influencing college students'willingness to participate in H.pylori screening from three dimensions:capability,opportunity,and motivation.Additionally,a Structural Equation Modeling framework was constructed to evaluate the overall fit of the model.Mediation analysis was then performed to uncover the specific pathways and mechanisms through which the dimensions of capability,opportunity,and motivation influence the willingness,elucidating their roles in detail.Results A questionnaire survey was conducted among 2 242 college students from 6 cities in Shandong and Shaanxi provinces.The score for college students'willingness to participate in H.pylori screening was(2.90±1.29),indicating a moderate level.Capability factors(health literacy,H.pylori knowledge level),opportunity factors(social norms),and motivation factors(self-efficacy,anticipated regret)had significantly positive and predictive effects on college students'screening willingness(P<0.001).The structural equation model showed good overall fit.Among them,capability factors(β=0.090)and opportunity factors(β=0.305)indirectly influenced screening willingness through motivation factors,with the last playing a mediating role.Specifically,self-efficacy(β=0.023)and anticipated regret(β=0.020)under the motivation dimension mediated the relationship between capability factors and screening willingness.Self-efficacy(β=0.180)and anticipated regret(β=0.073)also mediated the relationship between opportunity factors and screening willingness.Relationships between these factors were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions The willingness of college students to participate in H.pylori screening needs to be improved.Capability factors,opportunity factors,and motivation factors significantly and positively predict the willingness to participate in H.pylori screening.Self-efficacy and anticipated regret under the motivation dimension serve as mediating variables between capability factors,opportunity factors,and screening willingness.College students are recommended to participate in H.pylori screening as early as possible.
文朝阳;张宁
浙江大学医学院公共卫生学院,浙江 杭州 310058浙江大学医学院公共卫生学院,浙江 杭州 310058||浙江大学医学院附属第二医院,浙江 杭州 310009
临床医学
大学生幽门螺杆菌筛查能力、机会、动机—行为模型影响因素结构方程模型
college studentHelicobacter pylori screeningCapability-Opportunity-Motivation Behavior modelinfluencing factorstructural equation model
《健康发展与政策研究》 2024 (002)
125-135 / 11
评论