人民陪审员制度:何以成为"撬动"审判中心的"支点"OACHSSCD
People's Jury System:How Can It Become the"Fulcrum"of"Moving"the Trial Center
长期以来,在寻求审判中心改革落脚点的过程中,人民陪审员制度的功能一直未能得到凸显.而陪审员相较于职业法官的非专业性与兼职性特征,恰能成为催生直接言词原则、集中审理原则、阻断审前信息干扰这三大庭审实质化制度支撑的天然优势,使人民陪审员制度得以成为"撬动"审判中心的"支点".虽然如此,也应当理性看待支点的定位,因其具有间接性与偶然性,只有以"二阶行进"的务实路径才能实现改革目标:第一阶改革需解决陪审员实质参审问题,以提升陪审员参审意愿为重点,对陪审员…查看全部>>
For a long time,in the process of seeking the foothold of the reform of the trial center,the func-tion of the people's jury system has not been highlighted.Compared with professional judges,the non-profes-sional and part-time characteristics of jurors can become a natural advantage to promote the principle of direct speech,the principle of centralized trial,and the blocking of pre-trial information interference,which are the three trial substantive system su…查看全部>>
林铮汉
华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海 200050
政治法律
人民陪审员制度庭审实质化陪而不审陪审意愿
people's assessor systemsubstantive trialaccompany but not judgejury will
《西安石油大学学报（社会科学版）》 2024 (4)
108-115,8
2024年华东政法大学研究生学术研究与社会调研项目"刑事诉讼全流程适用企业合规的公检法分工及制度研究"阶段成果(2024-3-052).
评论