新质生产力驱动乡村全面振兴:理论逻辑、关键问题与实践方向OA北大核心CSTPCD
New quality productivity driving rural revitalization:Theoretical logic,key issues and practical directions
加快形成新质生产力与推进乡村全面振兴相辅相成,为促进农业农村高质量发展、实现乡村治理现代化提供了新指引.新质生产力以技术和要素配置的创新驱动产业振兴、以知识和就业机会的供给驱动人才振兴、以文化传承和传播方式的完善驱动文化振兴、以技术组合和发展理念的改良驱动生态振兴、以治理工具和治理模式的升级驱动组织振兴.但全面推进乡村振兴过程中仍存在数字基础薄弱、专业人才缺失、文化参与不足、开发理念博弈、数字技术负担等影响新质生产力驱动效果的关键问题.为此,未来乡村发展可从产业融合化、人才职业化、文化特色化、生态增值化和治理数字化等方面推动转型,为乡村全面振兴目标的实现提供新的实践方向.
Accelerating the formation of new quality productive forces and promoting comprehensive rural revitalization complement each other,and provide new guidelines for promoting high-quality agricultural and rural development and realizing the modernization of rural governance.Since entering the new era,the new knowledge productivity"industrial agriculture""quality agriculture"and"green agriculture"emphasized in promoting the comprehensive revitalization of rural areas are echoing the essential meaning of the new quality productivity"high quality,green and sustainable".The new quality productivity drives the revitalization of the industry with the innovation of technology and factor allocation,and makes innovations in the input of"new technology"and the allocation of"new factors"to promote the digital transformation and the expansion of multiple forms of rural industry,and realize the transformation from traditional to modern industrial structure.The supply of knowledge and employment opportunities drives the revitalization of talents,with the development of high value-added industries to create diversified employment and entrepreneurship opportunities for rural areas,and promote the enrichment of employment opportunities and the improvement of the accessibility of knowledge resources.Cultural revitalization is driven by the improvement of cultural inheritance and communication methods.With the help of digital technology,rural industry,human resources and cultural elements are integrated to promote the innovation of rural cultural inheritance and communication methods.The improvement of technology combination and development concept drives ecological revitalization,which is mainly reflected in the combination of green production technology enabled by science and technology and traditional agricultural production methods,and then promotes the green transformation of rural industrial structure based on the green development concept,and gradually improves the construction of ecological civilization.The upgrading of governance tools and governance models drives organizational revitalization,which is mainly reflected in the empowerment of the new generation of subversive information management technologies,tools and platforms to the decision-making process of rural organizations,which to a certain extent changes the bureaucratic tasks faced by rural organizations and the governance models that can be applied.However,it is worth noting that in the process of comprehensively promoting rural revitalization,there are still key problems that affect the driving effect of new quality productivity,such as weak digital foundation,lack of professional talents,insufficient cultural participation,game of development concepts,and digital technology burden.First,the weak digital foundation in rural areas delays the transformation and upgrading of new quality productivity formats.The basic conditions for the introduction and application of digital technology in rural areas are relatively weak,which limits the pace of the development of new quality productivity in rural areas.Secondly,the lack of professional talents weakens the sustainable development of new quality productivity.In recent years,the state has introduced a series of policies to enrich farmers'income channels and employment opportunities,which have alleviated the employment decline in rural areas to a certain extent,but there is still a big gap between rural areas and urban areas.Rural areas neither have the basis to attract talents,nor the new quality productive forces that can bear the growth of talents.Thirdly,the lack of cultural participation has affected the social nurturing atmosphere of new quality productive forces.At present,the development of rural cultural industry is often dominated by market demand,digital technology as the tool,urban aesthetic as the core,and popular elements as the guide.The development of rural culture under the embedding of digital technology often ignores the subjectivity of villagers.Fourthly,the game of development concept is divorced from the intrinsic value of the new quality productivity.The development of new quality productivity industries is often accompanied by the deep transformation and utilization of rural ecological environment,and the general ecological carrying capacity of rural areas is weak,objectively resulting in the use of ecological resources to obtain short-term profits and long-term development,individual interests and collective interests between the conflict.Fifthly,the burden of digital technology has increased the difficulty of managing new quality productivity.It is mainly reflected in the lack of information literacy of village elites,when the traditional rural governance pattern needs to be innovated,and the digital supervision of village governance needs to be strengthened.In order to deal with the above problems and reduce the difficulty of landing new quality productivity in rural areas,in the future,rural development can achieve transformation from the following aspects:industrial integration to consolidate the material foundation of rural comprehensive revitalization,talent professionalism to activate the source of rural comprehensive revitalization,cultural characteristics to cultivate the social heritage of rural comprehensive revitalization,ecological increment to build a green barrier of rural comprehensive revitalization,and digital governance to support rural comprehensive revitalization system.The above measures will help to break the realistic difficulties and institutional obstacles in promoting the landing and development of new quality productive forces in rural areas in the new era,and provide a new practical direction for the realization of the goal of comprehensive rural revitalization.
赵健君;刘启明;任雅静;焦芳芳
中国农业大学 人文与发展学院,北京 100193安徽工业大学 公共管理与法学院,安徽 马鞍山 243002
政治法律
新质生产力乡村振兴全面振兴高质量发展实践方向
new quality productivityrural revitalizationcomprehensively revitalizehigh quality developmentpractice direction
《重庆理工大学学报》 2024 (016)
67-78 / 12
安徽省哲学社会科学规划青年项目"乡村产业发展与小农户的有效衔接问题与路径研究"(AHSKQ2022D067)
评论