共赢促进合作的认知计算机制:互惠中积极期望与社会奖赏的作用OA北大核心CHSSCDCSSCICSTPCD
A cognitive computational mechanism for mutual cooperation:The roles of positive expectation and social reward
在社会互动中,人们常表现出有条件的合作行为,即只有在预期他人也合作时人们才愿意合作.当前该过程的认知机制尚不明确.本文采用多回合版本的囚徒困境范式,两项实验均表明个体的合作行为随合作者合作行为的提高而提高.认知计算模型显示个体同时采用了一阶信念(只根据他人过去的行为)与二阶信念(既根据他人过去的行为,也考虑自己的行为对他人产生的影响)去更新他们对合作者的合作概率的期望.结果显示个体的有条件合作行为的提升由积极期望(即合作成功使得个体对合作者建立了积极的期望)与社会奖赏(由合作本身带来的额外奖励)共同驱动.这些结果揭示了有条件的合作行为的计算认知学习机制,阐明了积极期望和社会奖赏对合作的促进作用,能为社会中各领域合作的成功推动提供了重要的科学证据与参考价值.
People usually exhibit conditional cooperative behavior during cooperation;that is,they cooperate only when they expect others will cooperate as well.The cognitive computations and the dynamic processes underlying such conditional cooperation in repeated interactions remain underexplored.To this end,this study investigates the cognitive mechanisms behind conditional cooperation,focusing on two hidden mental variables:positive expectation(participants'expected cooperation willingness of the partner)and the perception of social reward(additional reward derived from reciprocity). Using a repeated aversion of Prisoner's Dilemma Game(PDG),we conducted two experiments(n=134 in Experiment 1 and n=104 in Experiment 2)in this study.Nonsocial context(playing PDG with a computer program)was created to test if the effects are specific to social context(playing PDG with a supposed human partner).By manipulating partners'cooperation probabilities and response variability,we explored how positive expectation and social reward evolve during cooperation and to affect participants'behavioral outputs.We systematically developed six models to model participants'decision process during PDG.These models range from baseline model with random choice assumption(Model 1)to more complex formulations incorporating reward-based learning(Model 2),rational choice theory(Model 3),social reward(Model 4),and the integration of different learning rules(Models 5 to 6). The results of two experiments consistently demonstrated that participants dynastically adjust their cooperation decisions in response to their partners'behaviors.After separating the effects that may be brought by the partner's cooperation probability from those of response vocality,we found that participants'cooperation increases with their partner's increased cooperative behaviors,rather than with the partner's response volatility,an effect specific to social context.Model comparisons showed that participants'behaviors in both social and nonsocial contexts were best described by a model assuming social rewards and incorporating a learning algorithm that includes both first-order beliefs(based solely on others'past behavior)and second-order beliefs(considering both others'past behavior and the influence of their own behavior on others)to update their expectations of their partners'cooperation.The results indicated that increasing conditional cooperation is driven by both participants'positive expectation and social reward,effects that were specific to a social context. This study elucidated the cognitive computational dynamics of conditional cooperation,highlighted the roles of positive expectation and social reward,and showed that people applied a complex model with both first-order and second-order beliefs to update their expectations of their partner's willingness to cooperate.These contributions underscore the importance of understanding the mental processes that encourage mutual cooperation.Future studies might explore the neural correlates of these mechanisms or apply these insights to more complex scenarios,bridging the gap between laboratory research findings and real-world collaboration.
吴小燕;付洪宇;张腾飞;鲍东琪;胡捷;朱睿达;封春亮;古若雷;刘超
北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室暨IDG/麦戈文脑科学研究院,北京 100875苏黎世大学经济学系神经经济学中心,苏黎世8006,瑞士华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院上海市心理健康与危机干预重点实验室,上海 200062中山大学心理学系,广州 510006华南师范大学心理学院,广州 510631中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京 100101||中国科学院大学心理学系,北京 100049
心理学
条件合作社会奖赏积极期望认知计算建模信念更新
conditional cooperationsocial rewardpositive expectationcognitive computational modelingbelief update
《心理学报》 2024 (009)
1299-1312,后插1-后插11 / 25
国家自然科学基金(32271092;32130045)和国家社会科学基金重大项目(19ZDA363).
评论