| 注册
首页|期刊导航|临床医学工程|Parks松挂线术与分次紧线挂线法治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的效果比较

Parks松挂线术与分次紧线挂线法治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的效果比较

李朋桧 冯聪伟

临床医学工程2024,Vol.31Issue(8):945-946,2.
临床医学工程2024,Vol.31Issue(8):945-946,2.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2024.08.0945

Parks松挂线术与分次紧线挂线法治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的效果比较

Comparison on the Effects of Parks Loose Seton and Fractional Tight Seton in the Treatment of High Complex Anal Fistula

李朋桧 1冯聪伟1

作者信息

  • 1. 郑州阳城医院肛肠科,河南郑州 452470
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To compare the effects of Parks loose seton and fractional tight seton in the treatment of high complex anal fistula.Methods 120 patients with high complex anal fistula were randomly divided into two groups.The control group was treated with Parks loose seton,and the study group was treated with fractional tight seton.The therapeutic effect,wound healing time and anal function were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate of treatment in the study group was higher than that in the control group,and the wound healing time was longer than that in the control group(P<0.05).One month after surgery,the Wexner scores of the two groups were lower than those before treatment(P<0.05),but no significant difference was found between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions Both Parks loose seton and fractional tight seton can effectively improve the anal function of patients with high complex anal fistula.Compared with Parks loose seton,fractional tight seton has better efficacy,while the recovery time of patients is relatively long.

关键词

Parks松挂线术/分次紧线挂线法/高位复杂性肛瘘/治疗效果

Key words

Parks loose seton/Fractional tight seton/High complex anal fistula/Therapeutic effect

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

李朋桧,冯聪伟..Parks松挂线术与分次紧线挂线法治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的效果比较[J].临床医学工程,2024,31(8):945-946,2.

临床医学工程

1674-4659

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文