改良TLIF与PLIF治疗老年性双侧腰椎管狭窄的效果对比OA
Comparison of the Efficacy of Modified TLIF and PLIF in the Treatment of Senile Bilateral Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
目的:研究比较改良椎间孔入路腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)与后路腰椎椎体间融合术(PLIF)治疗老年性双侧腰椎管狭窄的效果.方法:选择 2022 年 6 月—2023 年 8 月在乐平市中医医院接受治疗的 98 例老年性双侧腰椎管狭窄患者作为研究对象,随机分为对照组与观察组,各 49 例.对照组实施PLIF治疗,观察组实施改良TLIF治疗.比较两组临床指标、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、日本骨科协会(JOA)腰椎功能评分、椎间融合率.结果:两组临床指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).术后1个月,两组VAS评分和JOA腰椎功能评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后 3 个月,观察组VAS评分和JOA腰椎功能评分均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).术后 1 个月,两组椎间融合率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后 3 个月,观察组椎间融合率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:改良TLIF与PLIF均可改善老年性双侧腰椎管狭窄患者的腰腿疼痛症状与脊柱功能,但是改良TLIF更利于患者早期康复,可减轻患者疼痛程度及住院时间,相对优于PLIF,临床可根据患者具体情况选择术式.
Objective:To study the efficacy of modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF)and posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF)in the treatment of senile bilateral lumbar spinal stenosis.Method:A total of 98 senile patients with bilateral lumbar spinal stenosis who received treatment in Leping Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from June 2022 to August 2023 were selected as the study objects and randomly divided into control group and observation group,with 49 cases in each group.The control group received PLIF treatment,and the observation group received modified TLIF treatment.The clinical indexes,visual analogue scale(VAS)score,Japanese Osteological Association(JOA)lumbar function score and interbody fusion rate were compared between the two groups.Result:There were significant differences in clinical indexes between the two groups(P<0.05).One month after surgery,there were no significant differences in VAS score and JOA lumbar function score between the two groups(P>0.05).Three months after surgery,VAS score and JOA lumbar function score in the observation group were better than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).One month after surgery,there was no significant difference in interbody fusion rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Three months after operation,the interbody fusion rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Both modified TLIF and PLIF can improve the symptoms of lumbar and leg pain and spinal function in elderly patients with bilateral lumbar spinal stenosis,but modified TLIF is more conducive to early recovery of patients,and can reduce the pain degree and length of hospital stay of patients,which is relatively better than PLIF.The operation can be selected according to the specific conditions of patients in clinic.
张睿;彭亮;吴思滨
乐平市中医医院骨伤科 江西 乐平 333300乐平市中医医院消毒供应中心 江西 乐平 333300
椎间孔入路腰椎椎间融合术后路腰椎椎体间融合术老年性双侧腰椎管狭窄
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionPosterior lumbar interbody fusionSenile bilateral lumbar spinal stenosis
《中国医学创新》 2024 (024)
1-5 / 5
景德镇市科技计划项目(20232SFZC066)
评论