| 注册
首页|期刊导航|中国卒中杂志|脑心共患疾病共治与分治模式的卫生经济学比较研究

脑心共患疾病共治与分治模式的卫生经济学比较研究

夏岩 王晓岩 林发 梁艳超 张佳妮

中国卒中杂志2024,Vol.19Issue(8):866-872,7.
中国卒中杂志2024,Vol.19Issue(8):866-872,7.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2024.08.002

脑心共患疾病共治与分治模式的卫生经济学比较研究

A Comparative Study of Health Economics of Co-Management and Separate Management Models for Brain-Heart Comorbidity Diseases

夏岩 1王晓岩 1林发 2梁艳超 1张佳妮3

作者信息

  • 1. 北京 100070 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院医务处
  • 2. 首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经外科
  • 3. 首都医科大学公共卫生学院
  • 折叠

摘要

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the health economic benefits of the co-management and separate management models for patients with brain-heart comorbidity diseases,to determine better medical strategy,and to improve treatment efficiency and financial benefits. Methods This study used a retrospective analysis method to collect the medical records of patients who were clarified into both neurological disorders and dysfunction(code MDCB)and cardiovascular diseases(code MDCF)following the Chinese diagnosis related groups(CN-DRG)method,and received treatment at the department of cardiovascular,department of neurology,department of neurosurgery,department of cardiovascular surgery,and department of interventional radiology of Beijing Tiantan Hospital,Capital Medical University from January 2019 to December 2023.The data including demographic characteristics,total length of hospital stay,various medical expenses,case mix index(CMI),and relative weight(RW)were recorded.Patients were divided into two groups:a co-management group(comprehensive treatment of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases during a single hospitalization)and a separate management group(treatment of neurological and cardiovascular diseases during separate hospitalizations).The baseline characteristics and economic indexes including the total length of hospital stay and medical expenses were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 442 patient data were included.The total length of hospital stay in the co-management group was significantly shorter than that in the separate management group(6 days vs.14 days,P<0.001).The economic benefit analysis showed that the total cost in the co-management group was significantly lower than that in the separate management group(¥65 967 vs.¥106 673,P<0.001).In addition,the RW value in the co-management group was significantly higher than that in the separate management group(2.24 vs.1.61,P<0.001). Conclusions Compared with the separate management model,the co-management model provides shorter hospital stays and lower total costs for patients with brain-heart comorbidity diseases,which is of great significance for optimizing the allocation of medical resources and the patient's diagnosis and treatment process.

关键词

脑心共患疾病/共治/卫生经济学/资源配置/诊疗流程

Key words

Brain-heart comorbidity disease/Integrated treatment/Health economics/Resource allocation/Diagnostic and treatment process

分类

医药卫生

引用本文复制引用

夏岩,王晓岩,林发,梁艳超,张佳妮..脑心共患疾病共治与分治模式的卫生经济学比较研究[J].中国卒中杂志,2024,19(8):866-872,7.

基金项目

国家重点研发计划(2021YFC2501101) (2021YFC2501101)

中国卒中杂志

OA北大核心CSTPCD

1673-5765

访问量0
|
下载量0
段落导航相关论文