|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|浙江农林大学学报|山区县域乡村空间活力评价指标体系构建与测度分析

山区县域乡村空间活力评价指标体系构建与测度分析OA北大核心CSTPCD

Construction and measurement analysis of evaluation index system for rural spatial vitality in mountainous counties

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]在乡村振兴和共同富裕背景下,探索提升不同地域类型乡村空间活力的具体路径,为乡村发展提供科学依据.[方法]以浙江省泰顺县为研究对象,从乡村生活、生态、生产活力3个维度系统构建乡村空间活力指数评价体系,应用综合评价法研究乡村空间活力发展的空间差异,利用纵横对比法识别各乡(镇)主导活力和短板活力,探索各类型区差异化提升路径.[结果]①泰顺县乡村空间活力空间分异特征明显,总体呈"局部高值,北高南低",大部分乡(镇)的活力水平比较低;各项子系统活力不尽相同,乡村生活、生态、生产空间活力分别呈现"局部低值,西高东低""北高南低""局部突出,四周高中间低"的空间分布特征.②以主导活力和短板活力为划分原则,将泰顺县划分为综合发展型、主导发展型、极化发展型和欠缺发展型四大类,并根据不同地域类型提出活力提升策略:综合发展型应高效利用各自的优势资源,形成强对弱的对点帮扶,联合活化,推进泰顺县乡村空间活力的跨越式提升;主导发展型应发挥自身优势活力整合协调其他活力;极化发展型应在提升主导活力的基础上重点考虑积极探索特色发展道路,补齐短板活力;欠缺发展型应深入挖掘文化、生态等核心资源,明确发展定位.[结论]泰顺县乡村活力水平整体较低,各乡(镇)也有不同的优劣势,体现了活力水平发展的不平衡不充分特征.提出差异化提升路径以期对泰顺县实现乡村振兴发展有一定的指导作用.图2表3参25

[Objective]This study aims to explore specific paths to improve the vitality of different regional types of rural areas in the context of rural revitalization and common prosperity,so as to provide scientific basis for rural development.[Method]Taking Taishun County in Zhejiang Province as the research object,a rural space vitality index evaluation system was constructed from the dimensions of rural life,ecology,and production vitality.The comprehensive evaluation method was applied to study the spatial differences in the development of rural spatial vitality,and the vertical and horizontal comparison method was used to identify leading and weak vitality of each township(town),and explore differentiated upgrading paths for various types of districts.[Result](1)The spatial differentiation characteristics of rural spatial vitality in Taishun County were obvious,displaying an overall value of high in local areas,and high in the north and low in the south.The vitality level of most townships(towns)was relatively low.The vitality of each subsystem was different.The vitality of rural life,ecology and production space respectively showed the spatial distribution characteristics of locally low,high in the west and low in the east,high in the north and low in the south,locally prominent and high in the surroundings and low in the middle.(2)Based on the dividing principles of leading vitality and weak vitality,Taishun County was divided into four categories:comprehensive development,leading development,polarized development and underdevelopment,and the following vitality promotion strategies were proposed according to different regional types.The comprehensive development type should make full use of their respective advantageous resources to offer targeted assistance and form joint activation between the strong and the weak to promote a leap-forward improvement in rural spatial vitality.The leading development type should give full play to its own advantages and vitality to integrate and coordinate other vitalities.The polarized development should focus on exploring distinctive development path and filling gaps in vitality while enhancing the leading vitality.The underdevelopment type should deeply tap into core resources such as culture and ecology,and clarify the development orientation.[Conclusion]The overall level of rural vitality in Taishun County is low,and each township(town)also has different advantages and disadvantages,reflecting the unbalanced and inadequate development of vitality level.The proposed differentiated upgrading path is expected to have a certain guiding role in achieving rural revitalization and development in Taishun County.[Ch,2 fig.3 tab.26 ref.]

王杰;郑国全

浙江农林大学风景园林与建筑学院,浙江杭州 311300

经济学

乡村空间活力指标体系共同富裕发展策略

rural spatial vitalityindex systemcommon prosperitydevelopment strategy

《浙江农林大学学报》 2024 (004)

850-860 / 11

国家社会科学基金资助项目(19BSH109)

10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20230478

评论