|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|解放军医学院学报|超声超微血流多普勒评估子宫内膜容受性及预测辅助生殖技术妊娠结局的价值:一项病例对照研究

超声超微血流多普勒评估子宫内膜容受性及预测辅助生殖技术妊娠结局的价值:一项病例对照研究OACSTPCD

Value of MV-Flow imaging technique in evaluating endometrial receptivity and pregnancy outcome

中文摘要英文摘要

背景 子宫内膜区域血流量是评价内膜容受性的重要指标,目前临床上缺少一种可有效定量分析子宫内膜血流量的超声评价指标.目的 探讨MV-Flow超声成像技术下接受辅助生殖技术的育龄期不孕女性子宫内膜容受性指标特点及其对辅助生殖妊娠结局的预测能力.方法 选取 2022年 5-12月于解放军总医院第一医学中心行经阴道盆腔妇科超声检查且接受辅助生殖技术的育龄期不孕女性为研究对象,以同期行相同检查的健康育龄期女性为对照组,两组均采用MV-Flow超声成像技术分析并比较子宫内膜相关参数差异.追访不孕组行辅助生殖技术后的妊娠结局,并评价MV-Flow超声成像技术对预测成功妊娠的价值.结果 接受辅助生殖技术不孕组 59例,年龄(35.41±4.89)岁;健康对照组 62例,年龄(33.10±5.09)岁.不孕组年龄高于健康对照组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.012).健康对照组子宫内膜厚度[M(IQR):0.9(0.7~1.0)cm vs 0.8(0.6~0.9)cm]、体积[M(IQR):3.71(2.66~5.10)mL vs 2.90(2.03~3.99)mL]、三维能量血流指数(flow index,FI)[(27.88±10.33)dB vs(23.84±10.42)dB]、微血流血管化指数(microvascular bleeding vascularization index,VIMV)[M(IQR):12.20%(5.15%~19.36%)vs 7.13%(3.08%~14.12%)]均高于不孕组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).根据妊娠结局分为妊娠组 29例,年龄(33.43±3.95)岁,未妊娠组 30例,年龄(37.66±5.01)岁,两组年龄差异有统计学意义(P=0.009).妊娠组女性的内膜三维能量FI[(28.88±7.92)dBvs(18.54±10.27)dB]、VIMV[M(IQR):13.42%(5.45%~16.99%)vs5.16%(2.17%~7.73%)]和抗米勒管激素(anti-Müllerian hormone,AMH)[M(IQR):2.49(1.24~6.05)ng/mL vs 1.61(0.80~2.49)ng/mL]高于未妊娠组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).子宫内膜VIMV对预测成功妊娠的曲线下面积为 0.794,VIMV分别联合年龄、FI、AMH、综合评价指标 1(F1)以及四者的排列组合预测妊娠结局的曲线下面积为 0.815~0.871,其中子宫内膜VIMV联合年龄、FI和F1的曲线下面积最大(AUC=0.871).结论 MV-Flow超声成像技术能够为接受辅助生殖技术预测成功妊娠提供影像学参考.

Background Endometrial blood flow is an important index to evaluate endometrial receptivity.Currently,there is a lack of an effective and quantitative ultrasonic evaluation index for endometrial blood flow.Objective To investigate the characteristics of endometrial receptivity of infertile women of childbearing age with assisted reproductive technology under MV-Flow ultrasound imaging technology and its ability to predict the pregnancy outcome of assisted reproductive technology.Methods Female infertility patients of childbearing age who underwent transvaginal and pelvic gynecologic ultrasound examination in the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from May to December 2022 were selected as the study objects,and healthy women of childbearing age who underwent the same examination during the same period were selected as the control group.MV-Flow ultrasound imaging technology was used to analyze and compare the differences in endometrium-related parameters between the two groups.The pregnancy outcome after assisted reproductive technology was followed up in the infertile group,and the value of MV-Flow ultrasound imaging in predicting successful pregnancy was evaluated.Results There were 59 cases in the assisted reproductive technology infertility group with age of(35.41±4.89)years,and 62 cases were in the healthy control group with age of(33.10±5.09)years,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P=0.012).In matched group,the endometrial thickness[M(IQR):0.9(0.7-1.0)cm vs 0.8(0.6-0.9)cm],volume[M(IQR):3.71(2.66-5.10)mL vs 2.90(2.03-3.99)mL],three-dimensional energy FI[(x)±s:(27.88±10.33)dB vs(23.84±10.42)dB]and VIMV[M(IQR):12.20(5.15-19.36)%vs 7.13(3.08-14.12)%]were significantly higher than those in infertility group(all P<0.05).The pregnancy outcomes of the infertility group were followed up,and there were 29 cases in the pregnant group(age,33.43±3.95 years)and 30 cases in the non-pregnant group(age,37.66±5.01 years),and the difference in age between the two groups was statistically significant(P=0.009).In pregnant group,endometrial three-dimensional energy FI[(x)±s(28.88±7.92)dB vs(18.54±10.27)dB],VIMV[M(IQR):13.42(5.45-16.99)%vs 5.16(2.17-7.73)%]and AMH[M(IQR):2.49(1.24-6.05)ng/mL vs 1.61(0.80-2.49)ng/mL]was higher than that in non-pregnant group and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The area under the curve of endometrial VIMV for predicting successful pregnancy was about 0.794,and the area under the curve of VIMV combined with age,FI,AMH and their combinations to predict pregnancy outcome was between 0.815 and 0.871,among which the area under the curve of endometrial VIMV combined with age,FI and F1 was the largest(AUC=0.871).Conclusion MV-Flow ultrasound imaging technology can provide a reliable imaging reference for the prediction of successful pregnancy with assisted reproductive technology.

宋梦洁;徐虹;汪龙霞

解放军医学院,北京 100853||解放军总医院第一医学中心超声诊断科,北京 100853

临床医学

MV-Flow成像技术微血流成像辅助生殖技术子宫内膜容受性三维能量多普勒

MV-Flow imaging technologymicroflow imagingassisted-reproductive technologyendometrial receptivitythree-dimensional power doppler

《解放军医学院学报》 2024 (008)

832-838,846 / 8

10.12435/j.issn.2095-5227.2024.091

评论