环境公益诉讼展开的实然状态与应然图景OACHSSCDCSSCI
The Actual Situation and Ideal State of Environmental Public Interest Litigation:Reflection Based on the"Green Peacock Case"
环境公益诉讼的开展,不仅对环境公共利益的救济发挥着重要作用,也是我国多元主体环境治理制度体系的侧面体现.在环境公益诉讼活动中,行政机关、社会组织和司法机关基于环境治理中的权力与权力、权力与权利的相互关系,分别扮演着维护环境公共利益的制度角色,但实践中的环境公益诉讼往往在诉讼要件、诉讼时机与诉讼类型等方面失之偏颇."绿孔雀案"作为我国第一起预防性环境民事公益诉讼案,对依据环评行政许可建设行为的主体提起民事公益诉讼,与环境公共利益损害救济的公法责任属性并不相符;而在环境行政机关依法行使行政权以实现对环境公共利益预防性保护的同时,法院受理社会组织提起的民事公益诉讼,又使得司法权与行政权行使顺位偏离.基于对"绿孔雀案"的反思,环境公益诉讼应然图景是,社会组织依法正当行使法律赋予其参与和监督环境保护的权利;环境行政机关在环境公共利益的保护中发挥优先主导作用;社会组织、检察机关和法院共同协作,以行政公益诉讼的方式督促行政机关依法履行监管职责.
The implementation of environmental public interest litigation not only plays an important role for the relief of environmental public interest,but also is the side embodiment of Chinese multi-subject environmental governance system.In environmental public interest litigation,administrative agencies,social organizations,and judicial bodies each play institutional roles in safeguarding environmental public interests,based on the interrelationships between power and power,and power and rights in environmental governance.However,in practice,environmental public interest litigation often suffers from biases in areas such as litigation prerequisites,timing,and types of cases.Just like Chinese first preventive environmental civil public interest litigation,the"Green Peacock Case",filing a civil public interest lawsuit against the party conducting activities based on an environmental impact assessment administrative permit does not align with the public law nature of environmental public interest damage remedies.Additionally,when the environmental administrative agency exercises its administrative power according to the law to achieve preventive protection of the environmental public interest,the court′s acceptance of a civil public interest lawsuit from social organizations causes a misalignment in the power sequence of exercising judicial and administrative powers.Ideally,the scenario for environmental public interest litigation is that social organizations properly exercise their rights to participate in and supervise environmental protection in accordance with the law,environmental administrative agencies play a priority and leading role in the protection of environmental public interests,and social organizations,prosecutorial and judicial bodies collaborate to urge administrative agencies to fulfill their regulatory duties according to the law through administrative public interest litigation.
朱谦
苏州大学 王健法学院,江苏 苏州 215006
政治法律
环境公共利益环境民事公益诉讼环境行政公益诉讼环境治理权力顺位
《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2024 (004)
14-28 / 15
评论