经鼻高流量加温湿化氧疗与无创机械通气对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者的疗效分析OA
Effect Analysis of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy and Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation on Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
目的:探讨经鼻高流量加温湿化氧疗(HFNC)与无创机械通气(NPPV)对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(AECOPD)患者的治疗效果.方法:选取 2021年 8月—2023年 8月济宁市兖州区人民医院收治的 78例AECOPD患者为研究对象,按照随机数字表法将其分为对照组与研究组,每组 39例.对照组采用NPPV治疗,研究组采用HFNC治疗.对比两组的临床疗效、动脉血气分析、痰液黏稠度、炎性因子水平及并发症发生情况.结果:研究组治疗总有效率为 94.87%,高于对照组的 76.92%,并发症发生率为 5.13%,低于对照组的 20.51%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗 1周后,研究组痰液黏稠度低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗 1周后,两组二氧化碳分压均低于治疗前,且研究组低于对照组,两组血氧分压均高于治疗前,且研究组高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组降钙素原、白细胞介素-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α、C反应蛋白水平均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:与NPPV相比,HFNC能够更好地调节AECOPD患者的动脉血气,还可以改善痰液黏稠度,控制炎症反应,且并发症较少.
Objective:To explore the therapeutic effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy(HFNC)and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation(NPPV)on patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD).Methods:A total of 78 patients with AECOPD admitted to Jining City Yanzhou District People's Hospital from August 2021 to August 2023 were selected as the study objects.According to the random number table method,the patients were divided into a control group an and study group,with 39 cases in each group.The control group received NPPV and the study group received HFNC.The clinical efficacy,arterial blood gas analysis,sputum viscosity,inflammatory factors and occurrence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The total effective rate of the study group was 94.87%,which was higher than 76.92%of the control group,and the incidence of complications was 5.13%,which was lower than 20.51%of the control group,with statistical significances(P<0.05).After 1 week of treatment,the phlegm viscosity of the study group was lower than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After 1 week of treatment,the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in both groups was lower than before treatment,and the study group were lower than the control group,the blood oxygen partial pressure in both groups was higher than before treatment,and the study group was higher than the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);the levels of procalcitonin,interleukin-6,tumor necrosis factor-α and C-reactive protein in the study group were lower than those in the control group,with statistical significances(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with NPPV,HFNC can better regulate arterial blood gas in patients with AECOPD,improve phlegm viscosity,control inflammation,and have fewer complications.
黄娜;朱刚;谷莉莉
山东省济宁市兖州区人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科,山东 济宁 272100山东省济宁市兖州区人民医院急症ICU,山东 济宁 272100
临床医学
慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期经鼻高流量加温湿化氧疗无创机械通气炎性因子并发症
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseAcute exacerbation stageHigh-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapyNon-invasive positive pressure ventilationInflammatory factorsComplication
《中国伤残医学》 2024 (017)
38-41 / 4
评论