|国家科技期刊平台
首页|期刊导航|浙江农林大学学报|金子山国有林场4种典型林分空间结构综合评价

金子山国有林场4种典型林分空间结构综合评价OA北大核心CSTPCD

Comprehensive evaluation of spatial structure of four typical forest stands in Jinzishan state-owned forest farm

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]综合评价湖北省金子山国有林场4种林分的空间结构,确定影响该区域林分结构的主要因素,为精准提升区域森林可持续经营水平和森林质量提供理论基础.[方法]基于常绿落叶阔叶混交天然林、杉木Cunninghamia lanceolata人工林、柳杉Cryptomeria japonica var.sinensis人工林和鹅掌楸Liriodendron chinense人工林实测样地数据,选取角尺度、大小比数、混交度和密集度等林分空间结构指标,应用单位圆综合评价体系对4种典型林分进行综合评价.[结果]不同林分中随机木个体的占比均为最高,不同大小比数等级林木比例整体上接近.常绿落叶阔叶混交天然林中林木整体呈现随机分布(角尺度均值为0.492),林分混交良好(混交度均值为0.747),但优势不明显(大小比数均值为0.497),林冠连续覆盖(密集度均值为0.941),资源利用率高.其他人工林分也呈现随机分布(角尺度均值为0.505~0.514)或轻微聚集分布(角尺度为均值0.529)的趋势,混交程度均较低.有部分林木表现出一定优势,在杉木林中最为明显.3种人工林中鹅掌楸人工林林木处于很密集(密集度均值为0.768)的状态,而杉木(密集度均值为0.557)和柳杉(密集度均值为0.563)人工林林分处于较密集状态,林木还有一定生长空间.空间结构综合评价指数显示:常绿落叶阔叶混交天然林(0.600)林分状态优于杉木林(0.583)、柳杉林(0.521)和鹅掌楸林(0.487).[结论]同一区域不同起源的林分结构存在差异,常绿落叶阔叶混交天然林的空间结构优于杉木、柳杉和鹅掌楸人工林.图2表6参37

[Objective]The objective is to comprehensively evaluate the spatial structure of four forest types in Jinzishan state-owned forest farm in Hubei Province,and determine the main factors affecting the forest stand structure in the region,so as to provide a theoretical basis for improving sustainable forest management level and forest quality.[Method]Based on the measured plot data of evergreen deciduous broad-leaved mixed natural forest,Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation,Cryptomeria japonica var.sinensis plantation and Liriodendron chinense plantation,forest spatial structure indicators such as uniform angle index,neighborhood comparison,mingling degree,and crowding degree were selected,and the unit circle comprehensive evaluation system was applied to comprehensively evaluate the four typical forest types.[Result]The proportion of random individual trees in different types was the highest,and the proportion of trees in different neighborhood comparison degrees was similar on the whole.The overall distribution of trees in the evergreen deciduous broad-leaved mixed natural forest was random[average value of uniform angle index(W)=0.492],and the stand was well mixed[average value of mingling degree(M)=0.747],but the growth advantage of trees was not obvious[average value of neighborhood comparison(U)=0.497],the canopy was continuously covered[average value of crowding degree(C)=0.941],and the resource utilization rate was high.Other plantations also showed a trend of random distribution(W=0.505-0.514)or slight cluster distribution(W=0.529),and the degree of mixing was low.Some trees showed certain advantages,especially in Cunninghamia lanceolata forests.Among the three types of plantations,the trees in L.chinense plantations were in a very dense state(C=0.768),while the stands of Cunninghamia lanceolata(C=0.557)and Cryptomeria japonica var.sinensis(C=0.563)plantations were in a relatively dense state,and there was still some growth space for trees.The comprehensive evaluation index of spatial structure showed that the state of evergreen deciduous broad-leaved mixed natural forest(0.600)was better than that of Cunninghamia lanceolata(0.583),Cryptomeria japonica var.sinensis(0.521)and L.chinense plantations(0.487).[Conclusion]There are differences in stand structure of different origins in the same region,and the spatial structure of evergreen deciduous broad-leaved mixed natural forest is better than that of Cunninghamia lanceolata,Cryptomeria japonica var.sinensis and L.chinense plantations.[Ch,2 fig.6 tab.37 ref.]

袁梓馨;郭秋菊;艾训儒;姚兰;朱江;王蕾;向钦

湖北民族大学生物资源保护与利用湖北省重点实验室,湖北恩施 445000

林学

金子山国有林场林分空间结构结构参数单位圆法综合评价

Jinzishan state-owned forest farmstand spatial structurestructure indicatorsunit circle methodcomprehensive evaluation

《浙江农林大学学报》 2024 (005)

928-938 / 11

国家重点研发-政府间国际科技创新合作重点专项(2023YFE0112805)

10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.20240162

评论