首页|期刊导航|中国临床药理学杂志|不同剂量瑞芬太尼复合七氟烷用于脊柱手术患者的临床研究

不同剂量瑞芬太尼复合七氟烷用于脊柱手术患者的临床研究OA北大核心CSTPCD

Clinical trial of different doses of remifentanil combined with sevoflurane in the treatment of patients undergoing spinal surgery

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 观察不同剂量瑞芬太尼复合七氟烷用于脊柱手术患者的临床疗效及安全性.方法 将脊柱手术患者分为低剂量组、中剂量组及高剂量组.低、中和高剂量组分别给予静脉泵注0.2、0.4和0.6 μg·kg-1·min-1注射用盐酸瑞芬太尼.比较3组患者的疼痛情况[视觉模拟评分(VAS)]、镇痛药物使用情况、苏醒质量、不同时刻[术前(T0)、插管即刻(T1)、静脉泵注瑞芬太尼5 min(T2)、10min(T3)、15 min(T4)]血流动力学指标,并进行安全性评价.结果 低、中和高剂量组分别入组49、56和51例患者.低剂量组患者术后6、12和24 h VAS 评分分别为(2.48±0.51)、(2.73±0.63)和(2.61±0.54)分,中剂量组 VAS 评分分别为(2.36±0.54)、(2.65±0.59)和(2.51±0.50)分,高剂量组 VAS 评分分别为(2.29±0.53)、(2.53±0.57)和(2.44±0.52)分,组间比较,在统计学上差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).低、中和高剂量组自控镇痛泵按压次数分别为(3.27±0.96)、(3.02±0.90)和(2.89±0.71)次,补救镇痛例数分别为2例(4.08%)、2例(3.57%)和0例(0.00%),在统计学上差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).低、中和高剂量组苏醒时间分别为(7.05±1.65)、(8.24±2.17)和(9.03±2.48)min,意识恢复时间分别为(11.26±2.73)、(13.85±2.94)和(15.57±3.17)min,气管拔管时间分别为(16.34±3.05)、(18.72±3.29)和(20.34±3.58)min,组间比较,在统计学上差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).3组患者的T0、T1、T2、T3、T4时间点血氧饱和度(Sp02)、平均动脉压、心率比较,组间比较,在统计学上差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).3组患者发生药物不良反应主要有低血压、恶心呕吐、心动过缓等,高、中、低剂量组总药物不良反应发生率分别为11.76%(6例/51例)、7.14%(4例/56例)和8.16%(4例/49例),组间比较,在统计学上差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).结论 脊柱手术患者采用0.2μg·kg-1·min-1瑞芬太尼复合七氟烷的苏醒质量更佳,安全性较高.

Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of different doses of remifentanil combined with sevoflurane in patients undergoing spinal surgery.Methods Patients undergoing spinal surgery were divided into low dose group,medium dose group and high dose group.Low dose group,medium dose group and high dose group were given 0.2,0.4 and 0.6 μg·kg-1·min-1 remifentanil by intravenous pump,respectively.Pain status[visual analogue score(VAS)],analgesic drug use,quality of recovery,hemodynamic indexes at different times[before surgery(T0),immediately after intubation(T1),intravenous pump injection of remifentanil 5 min(T2),10 min(T3),15 min(T4)]of the 3 groups were compared;and safety was evaluated.Results The low,medium and high dose groups were enrolled in 49,56 and 51 patients,respectively;the VAS scores at 6,12 and 24 h after operation in the low dose group were(2.48±0.51),(2.73±0.63)and(2.61±0.54)points,respectively;the VAS scores in the medium dose group were(2.36±0.54),(2.65±0.59)and(2.51±0.50)points,respectively;the VAS scores in the high dose group were(2.29±0.53),(2.53±0.57)and(2.44±0.52)points,respectively.There was no statistically significant difference between the groups(all P>0.05).The number of patient-controlled analgesia pump compressions in the low,medium and high dose groups were(3.27±0.96),(3.02±0.90)and(2.89±0.71)times,respectively;the number of remedial analgesia cases was 2 cases(4.08%),2 cases(3.57%)and 0 cases(0.00%),respectively.There was no statistically significant difference(all P>0.05).The recovery time of low,medium and high dose groups were(7.05±1.65),(8.24±2.17)and(9.03±2.48)min,respectively;the recovery time of consciousness were(11.26±2.73),(13.85±2.94)and(15.57±3.17)min,respectively;the extubation time were(16.34±3.05),(18.72±3.29)and(20.34±3.58)min,respectively.The differences were statistically significant(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in blood oxygen saturation(SpO2),mean arterial pressure and heart rate at time points of T0,T1,T2,T3 and T4 among the three groups(all P>0.05).Adverse drug reactions in the 3 groups were mainly hypotension,nausea and vomiting,bradycardia,etc.The total incidence of adverse drug reactions in the high,medium and low dose groups was 11.76%(6 cases/51 cases),7.14%(4 cases/56 cases)and 8.16%(4 cases/49 cases),respectively.There were no statistically significant differences(P>0.05).Conclusion 0.2 μg·kg-1·min-1 remifentanil combined sevoflurane has better recovery quality and high safety in spinal surgery patients.

谭海涛;陈涛;黎坚;林友才

海南医学院 第一附属医院 脊柱外科,海南海口 570102

药学

瑞芬太尼七氟烷脊柱手术镇痛苏醒质量血流动力学

remifentanilsevofluranespinal surgeryanalgesiarecovery qualityhemodynamics

《中国临床药理学杂志》 2024 (020)

2958-2962 / 5

10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2024.20.010

评论