首页|期刊导航|统计与决策|中国高标准市场体系的统计测度

中国高标准市场体系的统计测度OA北大核心CHSSCDCSSCICSTPCD

Statistical Measurement of China's High-standard Market System

中文摘要英文摘要

面对我国经济发展新阶段,党中央对市场体系建设提出了更高要求.文章构建了包括市场规模、市场结构、市场效率和市场监管四个维度的评价指标体系,基于2015-2021年中国30个省份的数据,采用熵权法确定指标权重,用优劣解距离法计算综合得分并进行排序.实证结果表明,高标准市场体系发展水平区域差异显著,沿海地区的省份综合得分显著高于西北地区的省份;从时间变化的角度来看,大部分省份的高标准市场体系综合得分变化不大,没有表现出明显的上升或下降趋势,宁夏和新疆排名波动较大且表现出较为显著的下降趋势.从分维度特征来看,市场监管与市场结构对于建立高标准市场体系的重要性较高,市场规模得分差异较大.

Facing the new stage of China's economic development,the Party Central Committee has put forward higher re-quirements for the construction of the market system.This paper constructs an evaluation index system including four dimensions:market size,market structure,market efficiency and market supervision,uses the data of 30 provinces in China from 2015 to 2021,adopts the entropy weight method to determine the index weight,and finally applies the TOPSIS method to calculate and rank the comprehensive score.The empirical results are shown as following:There are significant regional differences in the development level of high-standard market system,and the comprehensive score of the coastal provinces is significantly higher than that of the northwestern provinces.From the perspective of temporal change,the comprehensive score of high-standard market system in most provinces does not change much,showing no obvious upward or downward trend.Ningxia and Xinjiang's ranking fluctuates greatly and shows a relatively significant downward trend.From the perspective of sub-dimension characteristics,market regula-tion and market structure are of great importance for the establishment of a high-standard market system,and there is a large dif-ference in market size scores.

王宇;毕海;熊敏

长江职业学院花湖临空经济研究院,武汉 430074中南财经政法大学 统计与数学学院,武汉 430073长江职业学院花湖临空经济学院,武汉 430074

经济学

高标准市场体系熵权法优劣解距离法综合评价

high-standard market systementropy weight methodTOPSIS methodcomprehensive evaluation

《统计与决策》 2024 (023)

43-48 / 6

湖北省教育科学规划重大课题(2023ZD005)

10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2024.23.007

评论