火炸药学报2024，Vol.47Issue(11)：1031-1038,8.DOI:10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.202401009
基于固体火箭发动机工作原理的两种推进剂燃速测试方法对比
Comparison of Two Propellant Burning Rate Testing Methods Based on the Solid Rocket Motors Working Principle
刘佳浩 1石玉婷 2王芳 2丛俊皓 1王英红1
作者信息
- 1. 西北工业大学固体推进全国重点实验室,陕西 西安 710072
- 2. 湖北航天化学技术研究所航天化学能源全国重点实验室,湖北襄阳 441003
- 折叠
摘要
Abstract
In response to the challenge of efficient on the high-pressure dynamic burning rates of solid propellants testing,the impulse method and the mass flow rate method were respectively employed to measure the burning rates of two kinds of solid propellants under different pressures.The results show that in the pressure stable section caused by severe nozzle erosion,the burning rates obtained by the impulse method in three different time periods are 17.92,18.00,and 18.04mm/s,demonstra-ting the good consistency between individual testing results.The mass flow rate method is simple but yields unreasonable results due to the severe nozzle erosion.Results of parallel experiments of the two kinds of propellants indicate that the burning rate test results obtained by the impulse method have small deviations,with a maximum deviation of less than 0.3mm/s for com-posite propellants at 8-35MPa and 0.4mm/s for double base propellants at 8-25MPa,indicating that the burning rates ob-tained by mass flow rate method exhibite larger deviations.Nozzle erosion does not affect the burning rate results obtained by impulse method,and it can reduce the pressurization rate in the high-pressure stage,facilitating an instantaneous response of the burning rate to changes in pressure.The burning rates of composite propellants tested at 20MPa by using the impulse meth-od were 22mm/s and 21.96mm/s,with a maximum error of 0.45％compared to the standard motor method.关键词
物理化学/冲量法/质量流率法/固体火箭发动机/动态燃速/喷管烧蚀Key words
physical chemistry/impulse method/mass flow rate metod/solid rocket propellant/dynamic burning rate/nozzle erosion分类
军事科技引用本文复制引用
刘佳浩,石玉婷,王芳,丛俊皓,王英红..基于固体火箭发动机工作原理的两种推进剂燃速测试方法对比[J].火炸药学报,2024,47(11):1031-1038,8.
