首页|期刊导航|农业环境科学学报|国内外土壤砷的环境标准比较

国内外土壤砷的环境标准比较OA北大核心CSTPCD

Comparison of domestic and international soil environmental standards for arsenic

中文摘要英文摘要

土壤砷污染不仅危害农产品质量和陆生生态环境,也会增加地下水污染风险,且对人体健康存在重大威胁.本文从陆生生态毒理学效应、动植物体内积累暴露风险、人体健康风险和土壤-地下水迁移风险4个角度阐明了砷的土壤环境标准的推导方法和过程.本文还调研获取了北美、欧洲、亚太和非洲等19个国家和2个国际组织中包含农用地、住宅类用地和工业(含商业)类用地3种土地利用方式下共计139个砷的土壤环境标准值.结果表明:各国家和地区间制定的砷的土壤标准值差异较大,与国际标准值相比,我国在《土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行)》中制定的农用地筛选值为20~40 mg·kg-1,处于国际平均水平位置.我国在《土壤环境质量建设用地土壤污染风险管控标准(试行)》中制定的第二类用地标准筛选值和管控值分别为60 mg·kg-1和140 mg·kg-1,较国外标准更严格.在调研的3类土地利用方式下,各国家和地区制定的砷的土壤标准值在农用地和住宅用地土地利用方式下更加严格.制定的砷的土壤环境标准值的保护目标、毒性参数取值、暴露情景及途径和暴露参数与暴露模型的不同,是导致不同国家和地区标准值存在差异的主要原因.同时,对于我国砷的土壤环境标准的现状与问题,本文有针对性地提出了建议与发展方向.

In addition to posing a significant risk to human health,elevated arsenic concentrations in soil increase the potential for groundwater contamination and threaten the quality of agricultural products and health of terrestrial ecosystems.This study clarifies the derivation methods and implementation of soil environmental standards for arsenic from four perspectives:terrestrial ecotoxicological effects,risk of accumulation and exposure in animals and plants,human health risks,and risk of soil-groundwater migration.Furthermore,this paper examines and compiles a comprehensive set of 139 arsenic soil environmental criteria values from 19 nations and 2 international organizations across North America,Europe,Asia-Pacific,and Africa for various land uses,including agricultural land,residential land,and industrial(including commercial)land,providing a comprehensive global perspective on arsenic standards for different types of soils.The results showed:there were large differences in arsenic soil standard values set across countries and regions.Compared with international standards,China′s screening value of 20-40 mg·kg-1 for farmland in the"Soil Environmental Quality Risk Control Standard for Soil Contamination of Agricultural Land"was at the international average level,whereas the screening and control values of 60 mg·kg-1 and 140 mg·kg-1,respectively,for the second type of land in"Soil Environmental Quality Risk Control Standard for Soil Contamination of Development Land"were stricter than in foreign standards.For the three types of land use investigated,arsenic soil standard values set by different countries and regions were stricter for farmland and residential land uses.The main reasons for the differences in arsenic soil environmental standard values set by different countries and regions were the differences in protection targets,toxicity parameter values,exposure scenarios and pathways,and exposure parameters and models.This study is expected to provide a reference for revising and formulating arsenic soil environmental standard values for different land uses in China.Meanwhile,this article also proposes targeted recommendations and directions for development with regard to the current situation and issues associated with arsenic soil environmental standards in China.

戈子轩;吴同亮;王霞;黄奕航;朱琳芳;王小治;王玉军

扬州大学环境科学与工程学院,江苏 扬州 225127||土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室(中国科学院南京土壤研究所),南京 210008土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室(中国科学院南京土壤研究所),南京 210008土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室(中国科学院南京土壤研究所),南京 210008||中南林业科技大学环境科学与工程学院,长沙 410004土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室(中国科学院南京土壤研究所),南京 210008||中国科学院大学,北京 100049扬州大学环境科学与工程学院,江苏 扬州 225127

环境科学

土壤砷污染环境质量标准风险评估

soilarsenic contaminationenvironmental quality standardrisk assessment

《农业环境科学学报》 2024 (011)

2455-2471 / 17

国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFC1809102)National Key Research and Development Program of China(2021YFC1809102)

10.11654/jaes.2023-1095

评论