两种阴道黏膜切口缝合方法治疗前盆腔脱垂的效果及阴道微生态变化分析OACSTPCD
Efficacy and vaginal microecology changes of two suture methods of vaginal mucosal incision in implanting mesh for treatment of patients with anterior pelvic prolapse
目的 评价经阴道前壁植入TiLOOP Total4网片,阴道黏膜切口不同缝合方法,治疗中重度前盆腔脱垂的临床疗效、网片暴露及阴道微生态变化.方法 分析2021年6月至2023年6月,于上海中医药大学附属普陀医院妇科就诊,经POP-Q评分为Ⅲ~Ⅳ度的前盆腔脱垂初治患者及未使用植入物术后复发者共61例,随机分成两组,均行单纯前盆腔重建术,31例常规阴道黏膜缝合组为对照组(A组),30例改良阴道黏膜缝合组为研究组(B组),观察手术时间、手术中的出血量、术后住院天数;收集疗效的主观评价指标[盆腔器官脱垂及尿失禁性生活问卷(PISQ-12评分量表)、盆底功能影响问卷简表(PFIQ-7)]及客观评价指标(POP-Q术前后测量指标)数据;术前、术后阴道微生态变化的数据;术后是否出现网片暴露.结果 两组手术时间、术中出血量相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).与A组比较,B组术后住院天数缩短.B组Aa、Ba、C、Ap、Bp点术后上升更明显(P<0.05).术后6个月PISQ-12量表评分B组明显提升(P<0.05);术后1、6个月PFIQ-7量表评分B组"膀胱或尿道""阴道或盆腔"亚类差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).而肠道亚类差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).术后1个月,B组阴道优势菌为乳杆菌、pH等指标更接近绝经期女性的阴道微生态状态,较A组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后6个月网片暴露并发症A组1例,B组无.结论 经阴道前壁植入TiLOOP Total4网片后,两种阴道黏膜不同缝合方法,对中重度前盆腔脱垂治疗疗效确切;改良阴道黏膜缝合组患者满意度更好,且对阴道微生态有更早更好的纠正作用.
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy,mesh exposure and vaginal microecological changes of two suture methods of vaginal mucosa incision in implanting mesh for treatment of moderate and severe anterior pelvic prolapse.Methods Sixty one patients with recurrent anterior pelvic prolapse of POP-Q Ⅲ-Ⅳ degree admitted in the Department of Gynecology of Shanghai Putuo Hospital from June 2021 to June 2023 were randomly divided into two groups.All patients underwent simple anterior pelvic floor reconstruction,31 cases received conventional vaginal mucosal suture(Group A)and 30 cases received modified vaginal mucosal suture(Group B).The intraoperative blood loss,operation time,and postoperative hospital stay were observed;the subjective evaluation indexes(Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence Questionnaire PISQ-12 rating scale,Pelvic Floor Function Impact Questionnaire Short Form PFIQ-7)and objective evaluation indexes(POP-Q)were compared between two groups.The changes in the vaginal microecology,and the exposure of the mesh after surgery were also compared between two goups.Results There were no significant differences in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05).The length of postoperative hospital stay was shorter in group B compared with group A.Points Aa,Ba,C,Ap,and Bp rose more significantly postoperatively ingroup B(P<0.05).The PISQ-12 scale score was significantly higher in group B at 6 months postoperatively(P<0.05);there were significant differences in the subcategories of"bladder or urethra"and"vagina or pelvis"on the PFIQ-7 scale between group A and group B at 1 and 6 months postoperatively(P<0.05).The difference in the bowel subcategory was not statistically significant(P>0.05).At 1 month after surgery,the dominant vaginal bacteria in group B were Lactobacillus,pH value and other indicators were closer to the vaginal microecological status of menopausal women,and the difference between two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was one case of mesh exposure in group A and none in group B at 6 months after surgery.Conclusion After TiLOOP Total 4 mesh was implanted through the anterior vaginal wall,two different suture methods of vaginal mucosa are effective in the treatment of moderate and severe anterior pelvic prolapse.Patients with modified vaginal mucosal suture have more satisfaction,and the vaginal microecology can be earlier and better corrected.
苗爽;许岚;秦玲;胡佳贞;樊伯珍
上海中医药大学附属普陀医院妇产科,上海 200062上海中医药大学附属普陀医院妇产科,上海 200062上海中医药大学附属普陀医院妇产科,上海 200062上海中医药大学附属普陀医院妇产科,上海 200062上海中医药大学附属普陀医院妇产科,上海 200062
临床医学
盆腔器官脱垂临床疗效Tiloop网片阴道微生态
pelvic organ prolapseclinical efficacyTiLOOP total4vaginal microecology
《同济大学学报(医学版)》 2024 (6)
871-876,6
上海市医学引导类(中、西医)科技支撑项目(18411970500)上海市普陀区科学技术委员会卫生重点项目(ptkwws201906)
评论