首页|期刊导航|肝胆胰外科杂志|脾切除术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症继发脾功能亢进合并门静脉血栓的效果及安全性

脾切除术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症继发脾功能亢进合并门静脉血栓的效果及安全性OA

Efficacy and safety of splenectomy in the treatment of hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension complicated with portal vein thrombosis

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨脾切除术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症继发脾功能亢进合并门静脉血栓(PVT)的效果及安全性.方法 回顾性分析2016年12月至2020年11月上海市第一人民医院收治的85例肝硬化门静脉高压症继发脾功能亢进行脾切除术或联合贲门周围血管离断术患者的临床资料,其中术前无PVT者71例(无PVT组),术前合并PVT者14例(PVT组),比较两组患者术后脾功能亢进和肝功能相关指标的变化差异,以及两组患者手术安全性相关指标和术后并发症发生率的差异.结果 脾切除术后两组患者血红蛋白浓度、白细胞计数、血小板计数较术前均升高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).无PVT组患者脾切除术后血清白蛋白较术前升高,而谷草转氨酶(AST)、凝血酶原时间和白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分较术前降低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);PVT组患者的这些指标较术前差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);无PVT组的改善情况优于PVT组.两组围手术期安全性相关指标(术中出血量、手术时间、输血率、术后拔管时间、术后住院时间及术后并发症发生率)差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 肝硬化门静脉高压症继发脾功能亢进合并PVT的患者接受脾切除术能改善脾亢症状,但肝功能相关指标的改善不如无PVT患者;其手术安全性与无PVT患者相近.

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of splenectomy in the treatment of hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension complicated with portal vein thrombosis(PVT).Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 85 patients with hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension who underwent either splenectomy or splenectomy combined with periesophagogastric devascularization at Shanghai General Hospital from Dec.2016 to Nov.2020.Among the 85 patients,14 patients were diagnosed with PVT prior to surgery(PVT group),and the other 71 patients were classified into the non-PVT group.Changes in hypersplenism-related indices,liver function,along with safety-related surgical indicators and postoperative complication rates were compared between the two groups.Results Following splenectomy,both groups showed significant increase in hemoglobin concentrations,white blood cell counts,and platelet counts(all P<0.05).In the non-PVT group,serum albumin levels increased,while AST,prothrombin time and ALBI score decreased,all showed statistically significant difference(P<0.05).However,in the PVT group,these changes were all not statistically significant(P>0.05),which indicated better improvement in the non-PVT group.There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding to the intraoperative blood loss,the operation time,the blood transfusion rate,the postoperative extubation time,the postoperative hospitalization time and the postoperative complication incidence rate(all P>0.05).Conclusion For patients with hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension complicated with PVT,splenectomy may improve the symptom of hypersplenism;however,the improvements in liver function is not as effective as those with non-PVT,while the surgical safety remains comparable between the PVT group and the non-PVT group.

陈泽平;朱齐;朱翔;陈德盛;楼逸超;张益;孙红成

上海交通大学附属第一人民医院普外科,上海 200080上海交通大学附属第一人民医院普外科,上海 200080上海市第一人民医院酒泉医院(酒泉市人民医院)肝胆外科,甘肃 酒泉 735000上海交通大学附属第一人民医院普外科,上海 200080上海交通大学附属第一人民医院普外科,上海 200080上海交通大学附属第一人民医院普外科,上海 200080上海交通大学附属第一人民医院普外科,上海 200080

临床医学

肝硬化门静脉高压症脾功能亢进门静脉血栓脾切除术

liver cirrhosisportal hypertensionhypersplenismportal vein thrombosissplenectomy

《肝胆胰外科杂志》 2025 (1)

5-10,6

10.11952/j.issn.1007-1954.2025.01.002

评论